A critical RF amplitude
At exact resonance the absorptive voltage is largest at the critical calibrated nutation rate. The field is a co-rotating amplitude, half the peak linearly oscillating field.
CONTINUOUS NUCLEAR RESONANCE / SATURATION
Lock to resonance and step the calibrated RF nutation rate. Record the rise and fall of the absorptive voltage, infer the critical drive, and see which relaxation information remains inseparable.
Nominal vertical static field, transverse sample coil. Continuous RF and a matched reference arm feed a balanced bridge; the residual reaches a phase-referenced receiver. Ideal cancellation and flat calibrated gain, not a solved RF circuit. Cable motion is schematic.
CONTINUOUS DRIVE / SETTLED VOLTAGE EXPOSURES
61 independent settled exposures span calibrated nutation rates from zero to twelve hertz, at exact resonance. Rate is proportional to RF field; drive power is proportional to its square for an unchanged coil. No watt calibration or resonance-lock hardware is solved.
Ready. Predict, then acquire.
RAW VOLTAGES / SEPARATE SOURCE EXPECTATION
Teal: absorptive in-phase voltage. Gold: dispersive quadrature voltage. Dots: observations. Thin lines: source expectations. Purple dashes: record-only fit. Gray: exact saved records. Constant receiver baselines are retained and fitted.
RESIDUALS / COMPUTED FROM RETAINED VOLTAGES
Only recorded coordinates appear. No residual is generated before a supported fit. A small residual shows consistency with this response family, not independent confirmation of the physical law.
INFERENCE / SOURCE PARAMETERS EXCLUDED
Inferred critical nutation rate
Inferred relaxation-time product
Inferred in-phase baseline
Retained complex exposures
Voltage residual RMS
Unknown amplitude and baseline are profiled out. Only the relaxation-time product is identified. A linear unsaturated-response comparison rejects records without a resolved turnover. Search bounds and weak-information thresholds are diagnostic heuristics, not confidence intervals.
| Index |
|---|
SAVED COMPARISON / LIMITS & SOURCES
Single homogeneous, noninteracting resonance with exponential Bloch relaxation. No static field distribution, molecular shifts or coupling, heating, diffusion, radiation damping, finite settling, bridge imbalance, drive leakage, phase error or RF circuit loading. Receiver gain is assumed flat over the narrow carrier span. The bridge measures response voltage, not absorbed watts or individual nuclear outcomes.
Physics tutorial
BackgroundLock to resonance and step the calibrated RF nutation rate. Record the rise and fall of the absorptive voltage, infer the critical drive, and see which relaxation information remains inseparable.
Why it mattersA constant is inferred through a calibrated response and retained observations.
Start with the essentials
At exact resonance the absorptive voltage is largest at the critical calibrated nutation rate. The field is a co-rotating amplitude, half the peak linearly oscillating field.
A source scale is not supplied to inference. Different lifetimes with the same product and a compensating unknown gain give the same voltage curve.
Normalized absorbed power increases toward a plateau while the voltage component can decrease. No sample magnetization density, volume or watt calibration is supplied.
Typical misconceptionRecovering a source parameter independently confirms the law.
Better mental modelThese synthetic records test a measurement and inference workflow. They are not historical observations, a parameter confidence interval, or external scientific certification.
Acquire the full calibrated drive range, including zero drive and the high-drive tail.
What to observe: The unknown baseline and scale are fitted along with the critical drive. Residuals come from the retained voltages.Save the reference, then choose the same-product preset and acquire again.
What to observe: The source times differ but the mean voltage curves coincide. Neither time is separately reported.Compare the declining voltage tail with the power equation.
What to observe: A weaker voltage is not proof that less energy is being absorbed. The analyzer is not a calorimeter.