Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

Q001 · Amplitudes and measurement

Quantum State & Born Measurement

Can two states look identical in one basis and different in another? Yes. Two states can give each outcome with the same probability in one basis and still differ in relative phase. A measurement in a transverse basis, such as x instead of z, tells them apart. To separate a real phase difference from a mixed state or sampling noise, you need several bases and plenty of counts.

Prepare a pure state or a mixture, turn the analyzer and predict the outcome probability. Then record outcomes one at a time and compare how often each appears, with its uncertainty, against the density-matrix prediction.

Interactive modelQuantum State & Born Measurement
Model positive probability—\text{—}
Positive / negative / rejected—\text{—}
Current-setting trials—\text{—}
Acquired positive fraction—\text{—}
95% Wilson interval—\text{—}
Output-state purity—\text{—}

Simulated acquisition

Make a prediction, then collect the evidence.

No acquired record yet.

Inference from acquired counts

Acquire a scan to estimate the signal.

—\text{—}
Density matrix and count conventions
ρ=I+r⋅σ2\rho=\frac{I+\boldsymbol r\cdot\boldsymbol\sigma}{2}

Latest raw events · full record in CSV
EventSettingOutcome

Scientific basis: Feynman III.6 · MIT 8.05 · NIST Ramsey

Physics tutorial

Reading a quantum state through different bases

BackgroundA single quantum state predicts the outcome probabilities along every measurement axis. A mixture is less polarized than a pure state.

Why it mattersInterference experiments and state characterization need the relative phase and the statistics of the preparation. The population in one basis is not enough.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
If two states give the same probabilities along Z, which analyzer can tell them apart?
One-sentence intuition
A relative phase changes the probabilities for analyzers perpendicular to Z; a global phase cancels out of the density matrix.

Core mathematical model

Mixture with an unpolarized ensemble

ρ=v∣ψ⟩⟨ψ∣+(1−v)I/2\rho=v|\psi\rangle\langle\psi|+(1-v)I/2

A fraction of the ensemble is in the pure state, and the rest is completely unpolarized.

Born rule for a density matrix

P(+n)=Tr⁡(ρΠ+)=(1+r⋅n)/2P(+\boldsymbol n)=\operatorname{Tr}(\rho\Pi_+)=(1+\boldsymbol r\cdot\boldsymbol n)/2

The chance of a positive result depends only on how far the Bloch vector points along the analyzer direction.

Purity of the state

Tr⁡(ρ2)=(1+∣r∣2)/2\operatorname{Tr}(\rho^2)=(1+|\boldsymbol r|^2)/2

Purity grows with the length of the Bloch vector. It describes the ensemble, not the orientation of any single particle.

Common difficulties

A shorter vector means a mixture

Typical misconceptionA mixed state is just a pure wavefunction with a smaller norm.

Better mental modelA pure wavefunction always stays normalized. A Bloch vector shorter than the sphere's radius describes an ensemble, which needs a density matrix with unit trace and no negative eigenvalues.

What a confidence interval covers

Typical misconceptionThis 95% interval contains the true value with exactly 95% probability in this one record.

Better mental modelCoverage describes many repeated experiments, and for Wilson intervals it holds only approximately. It also leaves out errors in the apparatus and the model.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Predict in Z

    Choose the Z preset. Predict whether scanning the relative phase changes the fraction of positive results.

    What to observe: The model curve stays flat. New counts scatter around that same probability.
  2. 02

    Make the phase visible

    Choose Read phase and acquire a scan. Then turn the analyzer azimuth.

    What to observe: The fringe moves as the analyzer turns relative to the prepared phase. Its height is set by the transverse coherence.
  3. 03

    Mix the preparation

    Choose Partial mixture, then Maximally mixed. Acquire each scan with the same number of shots.

    What to observe: The density matrix changes. When no pure state is left, every analyzer gives a positive result half the time.
  4. 04

    Change the sample size

    Keep the settings fixed and collect 20 shots, then 2000. Change the global phase and repeat.

    What to observe: The Wilson intervals narrow as shots accumulate. The global phase leaves every predicted probability unchanged.

Related experiments and articles

Quantum evidence · Reading path

Clocks, traps and single-quantum control

Articles on this path that use this experiment, followed by the other experiments they suggest.

  1. ArticleCounting the quantum noise left by a perfect detector
  2. LabRamsey Frequency MeasurementCompare Ramsey fringes measured with a finite number of atoms
  3. ArticleHow helium atoms escaped the light and formed two narrow peaks
  4. LabSTIRAP Dark-State TransferMove an atom through a dark state with STIRAP
  5. LabLaser Cooling & MOTCompare the central momentum peak with the camera’s full spread

Quantum evidence · Reading path

Probability and exclusion

Articles on this path that use this experiment, followed by the other experiments they suggest.

  1. ArticleBorn: how a scattering direction became a probability
  2. LabPartial-Wave ScatteringCompare angular patterns in partial-wave scattering

Quantum evidence · Reading path

Bell tests and photon information

Articles on this path that use this experiment, followed by the other experiments they suggest.

  1. ArticleDense coding sends three distinguishable messages with one photon
  2. LabQuantum Teleportation & SwappingSend messages by dense coding and count errors, erasures and resources used
  3. LabHong–Ou–Mandel Two-Photon InterferenceSee the two-photon interference the analyzer uses
FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy