Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

Finite nuclear mass / Line positions

Hydrogen–Deuterium Isotope Spectrometer

Why do hydrogen and deuterium emit their spectral lines at slightly different wavelengths? Because the nucleus is not infinitely heavy. Electron and nucleus both circle their common center of mass, so the levels depend on a reduced mass slightly below the electron mass. Deuterium's heavier nucleus moves less, its levels spread a little wider, and each line shifts to shorter wavelength by about 0.03 percent. With the lines resolved, that gap gives the ratio of the two nuclear masses.

Separate two ideal Balmer lines with a calibrated scanning grating analyser. Keep every bin of photon counts, fit the spacing between the lines and infer the nuclear-mass ratio, which can take any value.

Interactive modelHydrogen–Deuterium Isotope Spectrometer

Normal incidence on a transmission grating; the first diffracted order reaches the rotating collection arm. Physical ray angles are unscaled. Fine scanning motion is tiny; sizes, bandwidth and slit widths are schematic.

Photon counts against calibrated vacuum wavelength

Count both peaks before assigning a mass.

Mixed isotope sourceTransmission gratingWavelength bins + counts

One scan keeps 181 equal-width bins. Both ideal effective Balmer lines are blurred by the same fitted Gaussian response. Changing the upper level changes the vacuum wavelength and the isotope separation.

Ready. Predict, then acquire.

Recorded bins

—\text{—}

Current analyser wavelength

—\text{—}

Raw counts with a bin-integrated Poisson fit

A small shift shows that the nucleus moves too.

(λ−λHref)/pm,Ni(\lambda-\lambda_H^{\rm ref})/\mathrm{pm},\quad N_i

Retained countsFitted doubletSaved counts

Dots retain zero bins; vertical bars show the square root of observed counts. Lines integrate over each bin. The optional gold source expectation is a simulation reference.

Infer from the recorded counts

One displacement. A continuous mass.

Inferred heavy/light nuclear mass

—\text{—}

Fitted wavelength separation

—\text{—}

Fitted common width

—\text{—}

No saved comparison.

Green: fitted light component. Brown: fitted heavy component.

λ−λHref  (pm),N^j,i\lambda-\lambda_H^{\rm ref}\;(\mathrm{pm}),\quad \widehat N_{j,i}

Model check against the kept counts

Keep the discrepancies visible.

ri=sgn⁡(Ni−μi)Dir_i=\operatorname{sgn}(N_i-\mu_i)\sqrt{D_i}

Poisson deviance per bin defines the squared residual; its zero-count logarithm term is zero. Outliers beyond the plotting range appear as red edge dots. This plot checks the declared profile, not historical evidence. Fit boundaries and conservative identifiability rules can withhold the derived parameter.

Inspect the last eight raw bins
Sampleλleft/nm\lambda_{\rm left}/\mathrm{nm}λright/nm\lambda_{\rm right}/\mathrm{nm}NiN_i
Model, geometry and evidence

Incident light travels along the positive horizontal axis to a normal-incidence transmission grating. Its period is one micrometre, and the positive first order lies in the horizontal dispersion plane. The collection lens, slit and detector share that outgoing axis. The calibrated Gaussian bandpass is assumed, not derived from the exaggerated slit geometry.

dsin⁡β=λ,d=1000 nm,m=1d\sin\beta=\lambda,\quad d=1000\,\mathrm{nm},\quad m=1

Independent Poisson bins integrate the full line profile. The source budget is the ideal expected signal sum over a complete scan, apart from truncated tails; it is not an absolute radiometric calibration. Background is fitted from the same bins. Counts are synthetic, and recovery of their generating law is not an independent experimental test.

The lighter nucleus is a known proton. The heavy nucleus is continuously tunable near deuterium; the estimator does not impose its expected ratio. Both ideal unbroadened lines have the same fitted instrumental width. Thermal broadening is omitted in this protocol.

Physics tutorial

Hydrogen–Deuterium Isotope Spectrometer

BackgroundSeparate two ideal Balmer lines with a calibrated scanning grating analyser. Keep every bin of photon counts, fit the spacing between the lines and infer the nuclear-mass ratio, which can take any value.

Why it mattersYou infer a constant from the observations you keep, read through a calibrated instrument response.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
Why do hydrogen and deuterium emit their spectral lines at slightly different wavelengths?
One-sentence intuition
Keep what the source is assumed to do separate from what you estimate from the recorded counts.

Core mathematical model

Line positions with the reduced mass

RM=R∞1+me/M,λM−1=RM(14−1n2)R_M=\frac{R_\infty}{1+m_e/M},\qquad\lambda_M^{-1}=R_M\left(\frac14-\frac1{n^2}\right)

The formula gives vacuum wavelengths from the nonrelativistic Coulomb model, without fine structure.

Mass ratio from the line spacing

r=MDMH=[1−ΔλλH1+ηη]−1,η=meMHr=\frac{M_D}{M_H}=\left[1-\frac{\Delta\lambda}{\lambda_H}\frac{1+\eta}{\eta}\right]^{-1},\quad\eta=\frac{m_e}{M_H}

Only the fitted center of the light line and the positive line spacing go into the inversion. The source mass and the isotope mixture do not.

Common difficulties

The simulation starts from the law

Typical misconceptionRecovering a source parameter independently confirms the law.

Better mental modelThese synthetic records test how the measurement and the inference work. They are not historical observations, they do not give a confidence interval for the parameter, and they are not outside scientific certification.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Predict which way the line moves

    Raise the source heavy/light nuclear mass before you acquire.

    What to observe: The heavy line moves to shorter wavelength.
  2. 02

    Keep the whole scan

    Acquire every wavelength bin, including those with zero counts. Save the run and export the CSV.

    What to observe: Moving the analyser probe does not change the recorded spectrum.
  3. 03

    Lose resolution

    Compare the Blended pair preset with Resolved pair.

    What to observe: A small residual alone does not mean the two masses can be told apart.

Related experiments and articles

Quantum evidence · Reading path

Laws and the formation of quantum mechanics

Articles on this path that use this experiment, followed by the other experiments they suggest.

  1. ArticleAtomic spectra: evidence for states, not photographs of orbits
  2. LabTwo-Isotope Doppler ThermometerSeparate heat from instrumental blur
  3. LabHydrogen Orbitals & SpectraExplore hydrogen spectra
FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy