Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics
Reading a stellar wind

Stellar winds · L1

How starlight pushes a stellar wind

Light can push gas away from a hot, luminous star. Atoms receive momentum when they absorb and scatter photons, and many such interactions can contribute to a stellar wind. A spectrum gives us a way to follow the encounters: some blue light disappears, while emission appears nearby. Both features can come from the same expanding gas.

Begin with the missing blue light

Imagine a bright stellar disk with gas flowing toward us in front of it. An atomic transition removes photons from a narrow part of the stellar continuum. Motion shifts that absorption toward the blue in our received spectrum. The result is a trough on the blue side of the line.

P Cygni names both a star and this characteristic type of profile. The supplied IUE ultraviolet spectra show the pattern around the magnesium-ion doublet, along with interstellar absorption, other lines and processing effects. A simple geometric picture helps separate the wind signature from those additional details.

Only gas lying between the disk and the observer can absorb its direct light. Gas behind the star is not on that path. In a monotonic expanding wind, this distinction explains why stellar-disk absorption comes from the approaching front hemisphere instead of the receding rear hemisphere.

Reading: IUE NEWSIPS manual, high-dispersion MXHI format · Standalone stellar-wind scientific reproduction

Why an atom selects a narrow range of light

An atom has discrete electronic energy levels. A photon with the right energy can excite a transition between them. The interaction is concentrated into a spectral line; the same gas need not intercept all neighbouring colours efficiently.

A photon also carries momentum. Absorption transfers an impulse along its incoming direction. Emission produces a recoil along the outgoing direction, which need not be the same. Starlight has a net outward direction, so the combined encounters can leave a net outward push on the gas.

The relation below gives the momentum of one photon. Obtaining a force requires another step: count how many photons actually interact per second and follow their outgoing directions. A bright continuum outside the line can pass through gas that is almost opaque at resonance.

pγ=Eγ/cp_\gamma=E_\gamma/c
EγE_\gamma is photon energy and cc is the speed of light. pγp_\gamma has the same momentum units as the motion of ordinary matter.

Reading: Owocki2014, Theory of Winds from Hot, Luminous Massive Stars · Lamers, Cerruti-Sola & Perinotto1987, the SEI line-profile method

The gas that absorbs can also add emission

Now look beside the stellar disk. There is no direct bright background on that sightline, but the surrounding gas is still illuminated by the star. It scatters some photons toward us and adds emission. Approaching material contributes on the blue side; receding material contributes on the red side.

An absorption trough and an emission peak therefore need not indicate two unrelated clouds. Different paths through one expanding wind can produce both. A calculation must add the visible volume and the attenuated stellar-disk rays, using the same velocity and opacity for each path.

The opaque star hides part of the rear-side emission and absorbs photons scattered back to its surface. An observing aperture can lose still more light from the extended halo while retaining the complete stellar disk. The absorption and emission areas need not cancel in the collected spectrum.

This description follows photon number. A moving scatterer can also transfer a small part of photon energy into mechanical work. Separating photon counting from energy transfer will matter when we ask whether the radiation can sustain the flow.

Reading: Lamers, Cerruti-Sola & Perinotto1987, the SEI line-profile method · Standalone stellar-wind scientific reproduction

A faster wind changes depth as well as width

Higher speeds usually spread Doppler shifts across a broader spectral interval. They also alter the gas itself. If the same mass crosses a shell each second, faster material spends less time there, lowering its density. A steeper projected velocity gradient shortens the distance over which a photon remains resonant.

Both changes affect optical depth. Keep mass flow and velocity-law shape fixed, and increase the speed scale from 200 to 300 kilometres per second. Density falls to two thirds, while the resonance gradient rises by a factor of 1.5. Local Sobolev optical depth falls to about 44 percent of its earlier value. The spectrum does more than stretch sideways.

An aperture changes a different part of the problem. Closing it does not dilute or slow the gas. It excludes some scattered paths from the observation. Changing speed and aperture separately reveals which profile changes belong to the wind and which belong to the way its light is collected.

Reading: Owocki2014, Theory of Winds from Hot, Luminous Massive Stars · Standalone stellar-wind scientific reproduction

Why one deep line may push too little

A very deep line may intercept only a narrow fraction of the stellar luminosity. Removing nearly all the light in that small band does not provide the momentum of the whole continuum. In the default illustrative calculation, the actual one-line force is less than one thousandth of the force needed to sustain the prescribed flow.

Real hot-star winds interact with many transitions, and their ion populations respond to density and radiation. Calculating how a wind starts and how much mass it carries requires those interactions to be coupled to fluid motion. A prescribed steady velocity law is useful for studying line formation, with its acceleration treated as an input.

Stellar winds also have other driving mechanisms. Gas pressure and magnetic processes matter for the solar wind; dust changes the problem around cool stars. The clue explored here belongs to hot, luminous stars: a spectral trough and its neighbouring emission record how photons meet an outflow.

Reading: Owocki2014, Theory of Winds from Hot, Luminous Massive Stars · Brands, Backs, de Koter et al.2025, X-Shooting ULLYSES XII · Standalone stellar-wind scientific reproduction

Exercises and explanations

  1. Why does the receding rear hemisphere usually fail to produce red absorption of the stellar disk in this geometry?

    Read the explanation

    It lies behind the star, outside the direct path from the visible photosphere to the observer. Approaching foreground material removes blue-shifted disk light; rear-side receding material enters this picture mainly through scattered emission.

  2. Emission weakens when the aperture closes. Does that immediately imply a lower mass-flow rate?

    Read the explanation

    No. An aperture can lose the off-disk halo while still collecting the entire stellar disk. The local gas and source function are unchanged; fewer scattered paths reach the observer.

Try the prediction

Change the flow and follow its scattered light

  1. Start with the blue view. Follow a ray from the stellar disk through the near-side resonance. Switch to red and find the path blocked by the photosphere.
  2. Move only the aperture and compare photon fates with the saved spectrum. Restore the full aperture, then drag the velocity arrow and watch depth change with width.
  3. Compare the nearly transparent and saturated presets. Predict which hides additional material more easily before opening the mass-flow and ion-opacity exercise.

Sources and calculation scope

  1. Owocki2014, Theory of Winds from Hot, Luminous Massive Stars

    Pinned v1; section2 for CAK/Sobolev steady winds and sections3.1–3.4 for line instability, clumping, porosity and velocity gaps. Linked theory source; original is not redistributed.

  2. Lamers, Cerruti-Sola & Perinotto1987, the SEI line-profile method

    ApJ314,726, sectionsII–V and equations4–10/14–19. Our local escape singlet and fixed-source finite-width test retain their separate approximations; no complete SEI/non-LTE solver is claimed.

  3. IUE NEWSIPS manual, high-dispersion MXHI format

    Native17-field binary rows, padded768-element vectors, one-based STARTPIX, vacuum heliocentric wavelengths, ABS_CAL physical units and FN noise.

  4. Brands, Backs, de Koter et al.2025, X-Shooting ULLYSES XII

    Pinned v1; sections3/5.3–5.5, Figures1/4/7 and Tables7/8. Twenty-five LMC O-type targets yield24parameter sets. Their model-conditional population/fitness results are external, not P Cygni measurements.

  5. Standalone stellar-wind scientific reproduction

    Original small data, independent transfer/photon/force/finite-width references,197producer checks and a proper synthetic Poisson exercise. Fixed truths and prior-averaged coverage remain separate.

FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy