Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics
Nuclear physics

L2 · Chapter 2

How a finite nuclear well selects discrete levels

A bound neutron oscillates inside a nucleus and decays outside it. Only selected energies let those two pieces join smoothly. This boundary condition produces discrete levels. Coupling the neutron’s spin to its orbital motion then splits a level into partners.

Specify the radial problem

Place the core at the origin. The distance rr increases outward. Set the potential to zero outside radius RR and to −V0-V_0 inside, with V0>0V_0>0. Hold the spherical core fixed and initially omit spin, absorption and core excitation.

For a moving core, replace the neutron mass by the reduced mass μ=mnMc/(mn+Mc)\mu=m_nM_c/(m_n+M_c). Separating angular motion and writing u=rRu=r\mathcal R gives the radial equation below. Orbital angular momentum ℓ\ell adds a centrifugal term that suppresses penetration at small radius.

−Cd2udr2+[V(r)+Cℓ(ℓ+1)r2]u=Eu,C=ℏ22μ-C\frac{d^2u}{dr^2}+\left[V(r)+\frac{C\ell(\ell+1)}{r^2}\right]u=Eu,\qquad C=\frac{\hbar^2}{2\mu}
With lengths in fm\mathrm{fm} and energies in MeV\mathrm{MeV}, CC has units MeV fm2\mathrm{MeV\,fm^2}. Regularity requires u(0)=0u(0)=0; a bound state decays at infinity.

Source: David Tong

Join the value and the slope

Begin with ℓ=0\ell=0 and write the energy as E=−SE=-S with S>0S>0. The interior solution is sinusoidal and the exterior one decays exponentially. Regularity removes the cosine solution at the origin; normalization removes the growing exponential outside.

A finite jump in potential leaves both the wave and its first derivative continuous. Dividing each derivative by its wave value removes the two unknown amplitudes. The remaining equation selects the allowed binding energies.

At the first binding threshold, S→0+S\to0^+ and the external decay constant approaches zero. The lowest matching branch therefore has kR→π/2kR\to\pi/2. An attractive potential below this critical depth has no normalizable spherical bound state.

uin=Asin⁡(kr),uout=Be−κr,k2=V0−SC,κ2=SCu_{\rm in}=A\sin(kr),\quad u_{\rm out}=Be^{-\kappa r},\quad k^2=\frac{V_0-S}{C},\quad\kappa^2=\frac{S}{C}
The two regions share one energy. Their curvatures depend on the energy relative to their own potentials.
kcot⁡(kR)=−κ,V0,crit=Cπ24R2k\cot(kR)=-\kappa,\qquad V_{0,\mathrm{crit}}=\frac{C\pi^2}{4R^2}
The threshold is for the first zero-angular-momentum bound state. Higher angular momentum adds a centrifugal barrier.

Source: David Tong

Worked example: double the radius

For an infinitely massive core take the rounded neutron value C=20.72125 MeV fm2C=20.72125\,\mathrm{MeV\,fm^2}. A radius R=3 fmR=3\,\mathrm{fm} gives critical depth about 5.68 MeV5.68\,\mathrm{MeV}. Doubling the radius to 6 fm6\,\mathrm{fm} lowers the threshold to about 1.42 MeV1.42\,\mathrm{MeV}.

The factor of four is a kinetic-energy effect. A wave spread across twice the distance bends more gently. Its smaller kinetic cost permits binding in a shallower well. These numbers follow from the radial boundary equation; no isotope data set their radius or depth.

A real neutron can polarize or excite the core and interact with other valence nucleons. A mean field supplies a useful basis for that richer problem. Measured excitation energies also carry the effects of those additional correlations.

Spin divides an orbital into partners

A neutron has spin s=1/2s=1/2. Combining it with orbital angular momentum gives j=ℓ+1/2j=\ell+1/2 and, for ℓ≥1\ell\ge1, j=ℓ−1/2j=\ell-1/2. Expand j2=(ℓ+s)2\mathbf j^2=(\mathbf\ell+\mathbf s)^2 to obtain the scalar-product eigenvalues below. Angular momentum operators here are measured in units of ℏ\hbar.

In the schematic interaction Hso=−ξ ℓ⋅sH_{\rm so}=-\xi\,\mathbf\ell\cdot\mathbf s with positive energy coefficient ξ\xi, the larger jj lies lower. Its 2j+12j+1 magnetic substates number 2ℓ+22\ell+2; the other partner contains 2ℓ2\ell. Together they preserve the same total number of states.

For ℓ=2\ell=2 and ξ=2 MeV\xi=2\,\mathrm{MeV}, six j=5/2j=5/2 states move down by 2 MeV2\,\mathrm{MeV} and four j=3/2j=3/2 states move up by 3 MeV3\,\mathrm{MeV}. The splitting is 5 MeV5\,\mathrm{MeV}. The degeneracy-weighted mean shift vanishes, providing a useful numerical check.

⟨ℓ⋅s⟩=j(j+1)−ℓ(ℓ+1)−3/42={ℓ/2j=ℓ+1/2,−(ℓ+1)/2j=ℓ−1/2,\langle\mathbf\ell\cdot\mathbf s\rangle=\frac{j(j+1)-\ell(\ell+1)-3/4}{2}=\begin{cases}\ell/2&j=\ell+1/2,\\-(\ell+1)/2&j=\ell-1/2,\end{cases}
At zero orbital angular momentum there is only one partner and the spin-orbit shift vanishes.
Eℓ−1/2−Eℓ+1/2=ξ(2ℓ+1)2E_{\ell-1/2}-E_{\ell+1/2}=\frac{\xi(2\ell+1)}2
The constant coefficient isolates angular-momentum structure. A realistic spin-orbit term also depends on the radial distribution.
10 states4 states · raised6 states · lowered
Schematic negative spin-orbit interaction for a d orbital. The total number of states and degeneracy-weighted energy are conserved.

Source: M. Goeppert Mayer

Try the reasoning in an experiment

Compare partner splitting with oxygen levels

  1. Predict the capacity of each partner from angular momentum.
  2. Choose One neutron outside oxygen and vary the spin-orbit strength.
  3. Read the model values and evaluated oxygen-17 levels separately. Explain why fitting one doublet does not determine another orbital.

Exercises and explanations

  1. Find both jj values, capacities and their splitting for ℓ=1\ell=1.

    Read the explanation

    The partners have j=3/2j=3/2 and j=1/2j=1/2, with four and two states. The larger jj is lower and the gap is 3ξ/23\xi/2. The six states equal three orbital projections times two spin projections.

  2. When can a finite-well eigenvalue be compared with an observed neutron separation energy?

    Read the explanation

    The fixed-core-plus-neutron approximation must be suitable and the potential parameters must be established from relevant data. Core polarization, pairing and coupling to the continuum can shift the result. The simple well first teaches matching and thresholds.

Sources and reproduced scope

Evaluated level energies and published reaction measurements retain their source versions and uncertainties. Model curves, schematic figures and synthetic scattering records are identified separately. The offline benchmark files state which calculations have been reproduced.

  1. David Tong, Quantum Mechanics, Chapter 4, spherical finite potential well

    Radial equation, regularity at the origin and the finite spherical well. Our bound-state threshold and tail curves are derived calculations for the stated infinite-core-mass example.

  2. M. Goeppert Mayer, On Closed Shells in Nuclei. II, Physical Review 75, 1969 (1949)

    The spin-orbit interpretation of shell closures. The course derives the angular-momentum eigenvalues; its oscillator parameters are schematic and do not reproduce a complete experimental shell spectrum.

FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy