Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics
Cosmic strings and the gravitational-wave background

From a loop population to the background spectrum

Sandbox Physics ·

The background is a sum over every loop that ever radiated. Count the loops of each length alive at each time, let each one emit its harmonics, redshift the waves to today and add them up; the result is a single integral over redshift. Deep in the radiation era the loop population has a closed form, and the integral gives a flat plateau whose height grows as Gμ α/Γ\sqrt{G\mu\,\alpha/\Gamma} when loops are born large.

This chapter uses the two before it, What the tension of a cosmic string measures and How a cosmic-string loop radiates and shrinks. You need the Dirac delta function, a change of variables in an integral and the radiation-era relations a∝t1/2a\propto t^{1/2} and H=1/(2t)H=1/(2t). Units have c=1c=1; times are measured in units of 1/H01/H_0 when numbers appear.

Counting loops of each length

Write the number of loops born per unit volume and time as R(ti)R(t_{\mathrm i}). In Model I every loop is born with length αti\alpha t_{\mathrm i}, and the rate is

R(ti)=Aα ti4,Ar=Ffr c~ vˉrξr3=0.54.R(t_{\mathrm i})=\frac{A}{\alpha\,t_{\mathrm i}^{4}},\qquad A_{\mathrm r}=\frac{F}{f_{\mathrm r}}\,\frac{\tilde c\,\bar v_{\mathrm r}}{\xi_{\mathrm r}^{3}}=0.54 .

Here c~=0.23\tilde c=0.23 is the chopping efficiency, vˉr=0.662\bar v_{\mathrm r}=0.662 and ξr=0.271\xi_{\mathrm r}=0.271 describe the long strings, fr=2f_{\mathrm r}=\sqrt2 removes the energy that goes into the loops' bulk motion, and F=0.1F=0.1 accounts for the spread of real birth sizes. Auclair et al., 2020, Section 3.1, eqs. 3.12 to 3.16

A loop of length ℓ\ell seen at time tt was born at the time that satisfies αti−ΓGμ (t−ti)=ℓ\alpha t_{\mathrm i}-\Gamma G\mu\,(t-t_{\mathrm i})=\ell:

ti=ℓ+ΓGμ tα+ΓGμ,dtidℓ=1α+ΓGμ.t_{\mathrm i}=\frac{\ell+\Gamma G\mu\,t}{\alpha+\Gamma G\mu},\qquad \frac{\mathrm dt_{\mathrm i}}{\mathrm d\ell}=\frac{1}{\alpha+\Gamma G\mu}.

Loops born in an interval dti\mathrm dt_{\mathrm i} occupy a length interval dℓ=(α+ΓGμ) dti\mathrm d\ell=(\alpha+\Gamma G\mu)\,\mathrm dt_{\mathrm i} today, and their density has been diluted by (ai/a)3(a_{\mathrm i}/a)^3. So

n(ℓ,t)=R(ti)α+ΓGμ(a(ti)a(t))3.\mathsf n(\ell,t)=\frac{R(t_{\mathrm i})}{\alpha+\Gamma G\mu}\left(\frac{a(t_{\mathrm i})}{a(t)}\right)^{3}.

In the radiation era (ai/a)3=(ti/t)3/2(a_{\mathrm i}/a)^3=(t_{\mathrm i}/t)^{3/2}. Substituting tit_{\mathrm i} and writing x=ℓ/tx=\ell/t gives

n(ℓ,t)=t−4 Ar (α+ΓGμ)3/2α (x+ΓGμ)5/2,x≤α,\mathsf n(\ell,t)=t^{-4}\,\frac{A_{\mathrm r}\,(\alpha+\Gamma G\mu)^{3/2}}{\alpha\,(x+\Gamma G\mu)^{5/2}},\qquad x\le\alpha ,

which is eq. 3.16 of Auclair and colleagues. NANOGrav writes the same density for any era with the extra term α˙∗t∗\dot\alpha_\ast t_\ast in the Jacobian, needed when the birth size changes with time. NANOGrav Collaboration, 2023, Section 5.4, eqs. 43 and 44

Worked example: where the 0.54 comes from

F/fr=0.1/1.414=0.0707F/f_{\mathrm r}=0.1/1.414=0.0707 and c~ vˉr/ξr3=0.23×0.662/0.0199=7.65\tilde c\,\bar v_{\mathrm r}/\xi_{\mathrm r}^3=0.23\times0.662/0.0199=7.65. Their product is 0.5410.541, the printed Ar=0.54A_{\mathrm r}=0.54. Dropping the Jacobian, that is using 1/α1/\alpha instead of 1/(α+ΓGμ)1/(\alpha+\Gamma G\mu), gives exactly twice the right density when α=ΓGμ\alpha=\Gamma G\mu; the saved failure cases of the method chapter record this.

Adding up the emission

A loop of length ℓ\ell at time tt emits power Gμ2PnG\mu^2P_n at frequency 2n/ℓ2n/\ell, which arrives today at f=2n/[(1+z)ℓ]f=2n/[(1+z)\ell]. Energy in gravitational waves dilutes as (1+z)−4(1+z)^{-4}, and a frequency interval is stretched by (1+z)(1+z). The energy density per unit frequency today is therefore

dρgwdf=Gμ2∑nPn∫dt (1+z)−3∫dℓ  n(ℓ,t) δ ⁣(f(1+z)−2nℓ).\frac{\mathrm d\rho_{\mathrm{gw}}}{\mathrm df}=G\mu^2\sum_n P_n\int\mathrm dt\,(1+z)^{-3}\int\mathrm d\ell\;\mathsf n(\ell,t)\,\delta\!\left(f(1+z)-\frac{2n}{\ell}\right).

The delta function picks ℓn=2n/[(1+z)f]\ell_n=2n/[(1+z)f] with weight ℓn2/(2n)\ell_n^2/(2n). With dt=dz/[(1+z)H]\mathrm dt=\mathrm dz/[(1+z)H] and Ωgw=(8πG/3H02) f dρgw/df\Omega_{\mathrm{gw}}=(8\pi G/3H_0^2)\,f\,\mathrm d\rho_{\mathrm{gw}}/\mathrm df,

Ωgw(f)=8π(Gμ)23H02 f∑nPn Cn(f),Cn(f)=2nf2∫0z∗dzH(z) (1+z)6 n ⁣(2n(1+z)f,t(z)),\Omega_{\mathrm{gw}}(f)=\frac{8\pi(G\mu)^2}{3H_0^2}\,f\sum_n P_n\,C_n(f),\qquad C_n(f)=\frac{2n}{f^2}\int_0^{z_\ast}\frac{\mathrm dz}{H(z)\,(1+z)^6}\,\mathsf n\!\left(\frac{2n}{(1+z)f},t(z)\right),

eqs. 4.4 and 4.5 of Auclair and colleagues. Auclair et al., 2020, Section 4.1 Because Cn(f)=C1(f/n)/nC_n(f)=C_1(f/n)/n, one table of the fundamental C1C_1 gives every harmonic.

The radiation-era plateau

At high frequency the integral is dominated by loops from the radiation era, where H=H0Ωr (1+z)2H=H_0\sqrt{\Omega_{\mathrm r}}\,(1+z)^2 and t=1/(2H)t=1/(2H). Change variables from zz to x=ℓn/tx=\ell_n/t:

x=4nH0Ωr (1+z)f,t−4=16H04Ωr2(1+z)8.x=\frac{4nH_0\sqrt{\Omega_{\mathrm r}}\,(1+z)}{f},\qquad t^{-4}=16H_0^4\Omega_{\mathrm r}^2(1+z)^8 .

Every power of (1+z)(1+z) cancels, and Cn(f)=(8H02Ωr/f)∫nr(x) dxC_n(f)=(8H_0^2\Omega_{\mathrm r}/f)\int\mathsf n_{\mathrm r}(x)\,\mathrm dx. The factor ff cancels too: the spectrum is flat. Summing ∑nPn=Γ\sum_nP_n=\Gamma and integrating nr\mathsf n_{\mathrm r} from 00 to α\alpha,

∫0αnr dx=2Ar3α[(1+ϵ)3/2−1],ϵ=αΓGμ,\int_0^\alpha\mathsf n_{\mathrm r}\,\mathrm dx=\frac{2A_{\mathrm r}}{3\alpha}\left[(1+\epsilon)^{3/2}-1\right],\qquad \epsilon=\frac{\alpha}{\Gamma G\mu},
h2Ωplateau=128π9 Ar Ωrh2 Gμϵ[(1+ϵ)3/2−1].h^2\Omega_{\mathrm{plateau}}=\frac{128\pi}{9}\,A_{\mathrm r}\,\Omega_{\mathrm r}h^2\,\frac{G\mu}{\epsilon}\left[(1+\epsilon)^{3/2}-1\right].

This is eq. 6.1. For large loops, ϵ≫1\epsilon\gg1, it becomes (128π/9)ArΩrh2Gμ α/Γ(128\pi/9)A_{\mathrm r}\Omega_{\mathrm r}h^2\sqrt{G\mu\,\alpha/\Gamma}. Auclair et al., 2020, Section 6.2.1

Worked example: the plateau for the Lab default

With Ωr=9.1476×10−5\Omega_{\mathrm r}=9.1476\times10^{-5} and h=0.678h=0.678, the prefactor is (128π/9)×0.54×4.205×10−5=1.015×10−3(128\pi/9)\times0.54\times4.205\times10^{-5}=1.015\times10^{-3}. For Gμ=10−10G\mu=10^{-10} and α=0.1\alpha=0.1, Gμ α/Γ=4.47×10−7\sqrt{G\mu\,\alpha/\Gamma}=4.47\times10^{-7}, so h2Ωplateau=4.54×10−10h^2\Omega_{\mathrm{plateau}}=4.54\times10^{-10}. The Lab's harmonic sum at 25 Hz25\,\mathrm{Hz} reads 4.46×10−104.46\times10^{-10}, lower by the 1.8 %1.8\,\% of cusp power beyond the 10510^5th harmonic. The paper prints the prefactor as about 1.02×10−21.02\times10^{-2}, ten times the value its own symbols give; the method chapter records this as an unresolved discrepancy and uses the symbolic form.

Where the plateau formula stops

The plateau assumes radiation domination for the whole life of the loops that contribute. At low frequency the signal comes from large loops that radiate after matter takes over, the spectrum rises into a bump, and the formula fails. For Gμ=10−10G\mu=10^{-10} the numerical fundamental-mode spectrum at one cycle per year is 2.432.43 times the plateau formula. The Lab blends the radiation and matter loop densities by the radiation share of the energy density, a teaching choice; Auclair and colleagues instead solve the one-scale model through the transition.

Lab task

In the cosmic-string Lab, drag the loop size from its default down to the smallest value while watching the dashed plateau line. The line follows the curve at high frequency for every size. Then choose Loops born tiny and compare the plateau with the small-loop limit in exercise 3.

Exercises

  1. Derive the matter-era density nm\mathsf n_{\mathrm m} from the same steps, using a∝t2/3a\propto t^{2/3}.
  2. By what factor does the large-loop plateau change between Gμ=10−10G\mu=10^{-10} and Gμ=10−16G\mu=10^{-16} at fixed α\alpha?
  3. Show that for ϵ≪1\epsilon\ll1 the plateau no longer depends on α\alpha, and evaluate it for Gμ=10−10G\mu=10^{-10}.
  4. The Lab's tiny-loop preset has α=10−8\alpha=10^{-8} and Gμ=10−10G\mu=10^{-10}. Evaluate eq. 6.1 and compare with the Lab's 25 Hz25\,\mathrm{Hz} readout of 2.09×10−132.09\times10^{-13}.
Answers
  1. (ai/a)3=(ti/t)2(a_{\mathrm i}/a)^3=(t_{\mathrm i}/t)^2, so n=Amti−2t−2/[αm(αm+ΓGμ)]\mathsf n=A_{\mathrm m}t_{\mathrm i}^{-2}t^{-2}/[\alpha_{\mathrm m}(\alpha_{\mathrm m}+\Gamma G\mu)]. Substituting tit_{\mathrm i} gives nm=t−4Am(αm+ΓGμ)/[αm(x+ΓGμ)2]\mathsf n_{\mathrm m}=t^{-4}A_{\mathrm m}(\alpha_{\mathrm m}+\Gamma G\mu)/[\alpha_{\mathrm m}(x+\Gamma G\mu)^2], eq. 3.17 of the paper, with Am=0.039A_{\mathrm m}=0.039.
  2. The plateau scales as Gμ\sqrt{G\mu}, so it falls by 106=1000\sqrt{10^6}=1000: from 4.54×10−104.54\times10^{-10} to 4.54×10−134.54\times10^{-13}. In the Lab the dashed plateau line drops by three decades between the two tensions.
  3. (1+ϵ)3/2−1≈3ϵ/2(1+\epsilon)^{3/2}-1\approx3\epsilon/2, so h2Ωplateau≈(64π/3)ArΩrh2 Gμh^2\Omega_{\mathrm{plateau}}\approx(64\pi/3)A_{\mathrm r}\Omega_{\mathrm r}h^2\,G\mu. Loops that die almost at birth radiate all their energy at once, whatever their size. For Gμ=10−10G\mu=10^{-10} this is 1.52×10−131.52\times10^{-13}. The paper's eq. 6.5 prints the coefficient as 1.52×10−21.52\times10^{-2}, again ten times the symbolic value.
  4. ϵ=10−8/(5×10−9)=2\epsilon=10^{-8}/(5\times10^{-9})=2, and 1.015×10−3×(10−10/2)×(33/2−1)=2.13×10−131.015\times10^{-3}\times(10^{-10}/2)\times(3^{3/2}-1)=2.13\times10^{-13}. Removing the 1.8 %1.8\,\% truncated cusp power gives 2.09×10−132.09\times10^{-13}, the Lab value. Neither limit of exercise 3 applies at ϵ=2\epsilon=2.

Sources

  1. Auclair et al., 2020, Section 3.1, eqs. 3.12 to 3.16
  2. NANOGrav Collaboration, 2023, Section 5.4, eqs. 43 and 44

Keep reading

What this page links to directly

Cosmic strings and the gravitational-wave background · Reading path

From one shrinking loop to a background spectrum

  1. ArticleWhy could a thin cosmic string shape a whole gravitational-wave spectrum?
  2. ArticleWhat the tension of a cosmic string measures
  3. ArticleHow a cosmic-string loop radiates and shrinks
  4. You are hereFrom a loop population to the background spectrum
  5. ArticleRecompute the radiation-era plateau of a cosmic-string background
  6. ArticleReading pulsar-timing and LISA results on cosmic strings
Something broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy