Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics
Conformal bootstrap

L2 · Chapter 4

Free fields solve the crossing equation exactly

Before asking which spectra are ruled out, it helps to have spectra that certainly work. Generalized free fields are the simplest. Their four-point function is built from two-point functions alone, it obeys crossing by construction, and its operator list can be read off line by line. They will reappear in the next chapter as the theory that sits exactly on the one-dimensional bound.

Correlators built from pairs

A generalized free field has a four-point function that is the sum of the three ways to pair four points, each pair contributing a two-point function. For a fermion one pairing enters with a minus sign. On a line this gives the closed forms below.

Swapping zz and 1−z1-z only permutes the three pairings, so crossing holds exactly. Nothing about the exchanged operators was put in by hand; they follow from expanding the closed form.

Aψ(z)=1+(z1−z)2Δψ−z2Δψ,Aϕ(z)=1+(z1−z)2Δϕ+z2ΔϕA_\psi(z)=1+\Bigl(\frac{z}{1-z}\Bigr)^{2\Delta_\psi}-z^{2\Delta_\psi},\qquad A_\phi(z)=1+\Bigl(\frac{z}{1-z}\Bigr)^{2\Delta_\phi}+z^{2\Delta_\phi}
These hold for any external dimension. The worked examples use Δ=1/2\Delta=1/2.

Source: D. Gaiotto · D. Mazáč

The exchanged operators

Expanding each closed form in blocks gives a ladder of two-particle operators. The fermion exchanges dimensions 2Δψ+12\Delta_\psi+1, 2Δψ+32\Delta_\psi+3 and so on. The boson starts one step lower, at 2Δϕ2\Delta_\phi.

Every coefficient cn2c_n^2 is positive and falls quickly with nn. For Δ=1/2\Delta=1/2 the fermion values are 11, 1/101/10, 1/1261/126, 1/17161/1716, and the boson values are 22, 1/31/3, 1/351/35, 1/4621/462.

Δnψ=2Δψ+2n+1,Δnϕ=2Δϕ+2n,n=0,1,2,…\Delta_n^{\psi}=2\Delta_\psi+2n+1,\qquad \Delta_n^{\phi}=2\Delta_\phi+2n,\qquad n=0,1,2,\dots
The fermion has no operator below its first rung. That empty interval is what the bound in the next chapter is about.

Source: D. Gaiotto

Worked example: reading coefficients off a Taylor series

Take the boson with Δϕ=1/2\Delta_\phi=1/2. Its closed form minus the identity is 2z+z2+z3+…2z+z^2+z^3+\dots. The lightest block is k1=−log⁡(1−z)k_1=-\log(1-z). Matching the zz term fixes c12=2c_1^2=2.

Then 2k12k_1 gives z2z^2 with coefficient 11, which already matches, so no operator of dimension 22 is needed. At z3z^3 it gives 2/32/3 against the required 11. The gap is filled by a block k3=z3+…k_3=z^3+\dots with c32=1/3c_3^2=1/3.

The same bookkeeping on the fermion gives c22=1c_2^2=1 from the z2z^2 term and c42=1−9/10=1/10c_4^2=1-9/10=1/10 from the z4z^4 term. The numbers agree with the general formula to every digit printed, which is an independent check of both.

With these coefficients, two boson operators already give A(0.3)=1.728406A(0.3)=1.728406 against the exact 1.7285711.728571. The full sum matches to six digits.

Aϕ(z)−1=2z+z2+z3+…,k1(z)=−log⁡(1−z)=z+12z2+13z3+…A_\phi(z)-1=2z+z^2+z^3+\dots,\qquad k_1(z)=-\log(1-z)=z+\tfrac12z^2+\tfrac13z^3+\dots
Matching powers of zz term by term fixes one coefficient at a time and shows which dimensions are absent.

Source: D. Gaiotto · D. Mazáč

What truncation does

Keep only the first three fermion operators. At z=1/2z=1/2 the crossing residual is exactly zero, because both sides are evaluated at the same point. At z=0.8z=0.8 it is −4.46×10−3-4.46\times10^{-3}, and at z=0.9z=0.9 it reaches −3.36×10−2-3.36\times10^{-2}. Ten operators push the residual at z=0.9z=0.9 down to −5.87×10−6-5.87\times10^{-6}.

This is the honest version of a numerical statement: a finite spectrum satisfies crossing only approximately, and the error depends on where you look. At z=1/2z=1/2 both channels converge equally fast, so numerical studies take derivatives of the crossing equation there.

Source: D. Mazáč · D. Simmons-Duffin

Try it in the Lab

Compare the fermion and the boson

  1. Open the free-boson preset and note the first exchanged operator. Compare it with the free-fermion preset.
  2. Predict how the mismatch curve will look if the first coefficient is wrong, then pick that preset.
  3. With the too-few-operators preset, drag the point toward the right end and watch the residual grow.

Exercises with explained answers

  1. For a fermion with Δψ=0.8\Delta_\psi=0.8, what is the dimension of the first exchanged operator?

    Show the answer

    2Δψ+1=2.62\Delta_\psi+1=2.6. No operator lies between the identity and this value.

  2. Using Aψ−1=z2+z3+z4+…A_\psi-1=z^2+z^3+z^4+\dots for Δψ=1/2\Delta_\psi=1/2 and k2=z2(1+z+910z2+… )k_2=z^2(1+z+\tfrac{9}{10}z^2+\dots), show that no operator of dimension 33 appears.

    Show the answer

    With c22=1c_2^2=1, the block k2k_2 already supplies z3z^3 with coefficient 11, exactly what AψA_\psi needs. A dimension-3 operator would add an extra z3z^3, so its coefficient must vanish.

  3. Flip the sign of the fermion coefficient c42c_4^2 and keep everything else. Would crossing still hold?

    Show the answer

    No. The crossing residual at z=0.3z=0.3 becomes 0.1140.114. Unitarity would also be violated, because it requires every c2≥0c^2\ge 0.

Sources and what we recomputed

  1. D. Simmons-Duffin, TASI Lectures on the Conformal Bootstrap, arXiv:1602.07982v1 (2016)

    Version 1. Eqs. (157)-(158): the four-point function as a sum over conformal multiplets, one conformal block each. Eqs. (164)-(168): the Casimir equation for blocks and their closed form in two dimensions, built from the one-variable function k. Eqs. (194)-(199), Sections 10.5-10.7: the crossing equation for identical scalars as a sum of vectors, the derivative functionals and the assumptions behind the scalar-gap bound. Fig. 26: 2D crossing vectors. Fig. 27 and Table 1: 2D bounds for derivative cutoffs 6 to 28 with the kink at the Ising point. Fig. 28: the 3D bound with its kink.

  2. D. Mazáč, Analytic bounds and emergence of AdS2 physics from the conformal bootstrap, arXiv:1611.10060v1; JHEP 04 (2017) 146

    Version 1. Eqs. (2.12)-(2.17): the four-point function of identical operators on a line, the cross-ratio, the one-variable block and the crossing equation. Eq. (2.18) and Fig. 2: the numerical gap bound, which the text says converges to twice the external dimension plus one as derivatives are added. Eqs. (2.19)-(2.23): the generalized free fermion that saturates it and the zeros of the extremal functional. Fig. 1: the action of a typical extremal functional.

  3. D. Gaiotto, D. Mazáč and M. F. Paulos, Bootstrapping the 3d Ising twist defect, arXiv:1310.5078v2; JHEP 03 (2014) 100

    Version 2. Section 4.1: one-dimensional generalized free fields. Eqs. (4.17) and (4.20) give the exchanged dimensions and OPE coefficients of the fermionic and bosonic solutions; the course resums them against the closed-form correlators.

FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy