Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics
Searching for axions with cosmic magnetic fields

Photon and axion as two mixing states

Sandbox Physics · · L1 · Course chapter

In a uniform magnetic field, a photon polarized along the field and an axion of the same energy behave like a two-state quantum system. The photon turns into an axion and back with a fixed rhythm. The largest fraction it can reach is set by how strong the mixing is compared with the mismatch between the two states, and the rhythm is set by the sum of the two. This chapter derives that probability, checks its limits and evaluates it for one cluster-sized example.

You need complex exponentials, a two-by-two symmetric matrix and its eigenvalues. Natural units are used throughout, with the reduced Planck constant and the speed of light set to one, so energies, inverse lengths and masses are all measured in electronvolts. At the end the answers are converted to kiloparsecs.

The equation for one polarization

Let the beam travel along zz with energy EE. Only the magnetic field component across the beam, B⊥B_\perp, can mix the photon with the axion, and only the photon polarization along that component takes part. Call its amplitude A∥A_\parallel and the axion amplitude aa. The other polarization, A⊥A_\perp, only picks up a phase.

For energies far above the axion mass and the plasma frequency, the second-order wave equation reduces to a first-order one. In the sign convention used on this site,

iddz(A∥a)=−(ΔplΔaγΔaγΔa)(A∥a),i\frac{\mathrm d}{\mathrm dz}\begin{pmatrix}A_\parallel\\a\end{pmatrix}=-\begin{pmatrix}\Delta_{\rm pl}&\Delta_{a\gamma}\\\Delta_{a\gamma}&\Delta_a\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}A_\parallel\\a\end{pmatrix},

with three entries, each an inverse length:

Δaγ=gaγB⊥2,Δa=−ma22E,Δpl=−ωpl22E.\Delta_{a\gamma}=\frac{g_{a\gamma}B_\perp}{2},\qquad\Delta_a=-\frac{m_a^2}{2E},\qquad\Delta_{\rm pl}=-\frac{\omega_{\rm pl}^2}{2E}.

The off-diagonal Δaγ\Delta_{a\gamma} is the mixing. The diagonal entries say how far each state's phase drifts from that of a massless wave. The axion drifts because of its mass mam_a. The photon drifts because free electrons in the plasma give it an effective mass equal to the plasma frequency ωpl\omega_{\rm pl}. The same matrix, with the other polarization added, appears as eq. (5) of Meyer, Horns and Raue, 2013 and in the appendix of Mirizzi, Raffelt and Serpico, 2007. Both also carry a vacuum-polarization term that is negligible for keV photons in microgauss fields, and this chapter drops it.

Solving it by rotating the basis

A constant symmetric matrix has two real eigenvalues and orthogonal eigenvectors. Write the mixing angle θ\theta through

tan⁡2θ=2ΔaγΔpl−Δa.\tan2\theta=\frac{2\Delta_{a\gamma}}{\Delta_{\rm pl}-\Delta_a}.

The eigenvalues are λ±=12(Δpl+Δa)±12Δosc\lambda_\pm=\tfrac12(\Delta_{\rm pl}+\Delta_a)\pm\tfrac12\Delta_{\rm osc}, where

Δosc=(Δpl−Δa)2+4Δaγ2.\Delta_{\rm osc}=\sqrt{(\Delta_{\rm pl}-\Delta_a)^2+4\Delta_{a\gamma}^2}.

In the rotated basis each component simply gains a phase eiλ±z\mathrm e^{i\lambda_\pm z}. Start with a pure photon, A∥=1A_\parallel=1 and a=0a=0. Rotate into the eigenbasis, let each part evolve, and rotate back. The axion amplitude is

a(z)=sin⁡θcos⁡θ(eiλ+z−eiλ−z).a(z)=\sin\theta\cos\theta\left(\mathrm e^{i\lambda_+z}-\mathrm e^{i\lambda_-z}\right).

Its squared magnitude is the conversion probability. Using ∣eix−eiy∣2=4sin⁡2x−y2\lvert\mathrm e^{ix}-\mathrm e^{iy}\rvert^2=4\sin^2\tfrac{x-y}{2} and sin⁡2θ=2Δaγ/Δosc\sin2\theta=2\Delta_{a\gamma}/\Delta_{\rm osc},

Pγ→a(L)=(2ΔaγΔosc)2sin⁡2 ⁣(ΔoscL2).P_{\gamma\to a}(L)=\left(\frac{2\Delta_{a\gamma}}{\Delta_{\rm osc}}\right)^2\sin^2\!\left(\frac{\Delta_{\rm osc}L}{2}\right).

The common phase from Δpl+Δa\Delta_{\rm pl}+\Delta_a cancels. Only the difference between the two states and the mixing between them matter.

Four limits to check

Set the coupling or the field to zero. Then Δaγ=0\Delta_{a\gamma}=0 and the probability vanishes at every length and energy, as it must.

Make the path short, ΔoscL≪1\Delta_{\rm osc}L\ll1. The sine is close to its argument and the mismatch drops out:

Pγ→a≃(ΔaγL)2=(gaγB⊥L2)2.P_{\gamma\to a}\simeq(\Delta_{a\gamma}L)^2=\left(\frac{g_{a\gamma}B_\perp L}{2}\right)^2.

This is why the probability grows as the square of field times length at first.

Tune the axion mass to the plasma frequency. The diagonal entries become equal, the amplitude factor is one, and Pγ→a=sin⁡2(ΔaγL)P_{\gamma\to a}=\sin^2(\Delta_{a\gamma}L). The energy has dropped out completely. The next chapter uses this resonance.

Finally, photon survival plus axion fraction always add to one, because the evolution only rotates and rephases the two amplitudes.

From electronvolts to kiloparsecs

The units need two conversions. One tesla is 195.35 eV2195.35\,\mathrm{eV^2} in these units, so one microgauss, 10−1010^{-10} tesla, is 1.9535×10−8 eV21.9535\times10^{-8}\,\mathrm{eV^2}. One kiloparsec is 1.5637×1026 eV−11.5637\times10^{26}\,\mathrm{eV^{-1}}. With gaγ=10−11 GeV−1=10−20 eV−1g_{a\gamma}=10^{-11}\,\mathrm{GeV^{-1}}=10^{-20}\,\mathrm{eV^{-1}} and B⊥=1 μGB_\perp=1\,\mu\mathrm G,

Δaγ=10−20×1.9535×10−82 eV=9.77×10−29 eV.\Delta_{a\gamma}=\frac{10^{-20}\times1.9535\times10^{-8}}{2}\,\mathrm{eV}=9.77\times10^{-29}\,\mathrm{eV}.

Multiplying by the number of inverse electronvolts in one kiloparsec turns this into

Δaγ=9.77×10−29×1.5637×1026 kpc−1=1.527×10−2 kpc−1.\Delta_{a\gamma}=9.77\times10^{-29}\times1.5637\times10^{26}\,\mathrm{kpc^{-1}}=1.527\times10^{-2}\,\mathrm{kpc^{-1}}.

The mixing term scales linearly with both the coupling and the field. We derived these conversions from CODATA constants and checked the tesla value a second way, through the critical field me2/em_e^2/e.

Worked example: one uniform field

Take gaγ=10−11 GeV−1g_{a\gamma}=10^{-11}\,\mathrm{GeV^{-1}}, B⊥=5 μGB_\perp=5\,\mu\mathrm G, electron density 10−2.5 cm−310^{-2.5}\,\mathrm{cm^{-3}}, ma=10−13 eVm_a=10^{-13}\,\mathrm{eV}, a 96 kpc path and E=6.6 keVE=6.6\,\mathrm{keV}. The three entries are

Table 2.1 Mixing-matrix entries for the uniform example.
EntryValue in inverse kiloparsecs
Δaγ\Delta_{a\gamma}7.64×10−27.64\times10^{-2}
Δpl\Delta_{\rm pl}−5.17×10−2-5.17\times10^{-2}
Δa\Delta_a−1.18×10−4-1.18\times10^{-4}

Then Δosc=0.161 kpc−1\Delta_{\rm osc}=0.161\,\mathrm{kpc^{-1}}, so one full cycle takes 2π/Δosc=39.02\pi/\Delta_{\rm osc}=39.0 kpc. The amplitude factor is (0.1527/0.1612)2=0.898(0.1527/0.1612)^2=0.898. The phase over the path is ΔoscL/2=7.74\Delta_{\rm osc}L/2=7.74 rad, and sin⁡2(7.74)=0.987\sin^2(7.74)=0.987. A photon polarized along the field converts with probability

Pγ→a=0.898×0.987=0.886.P_{\gamma\to a}=0.898\times0.987=0.886.

Unpolarized light is an equal mixture of the two polarizations, and only one of them mixes. Its survival is 1−Pγ→a/2=0.5571-P_{\gamma\to a}/2=0.557. At 2, 4 and 9 keV the same path gives survival 0.777, 0.718 and 0.570, so the dimming changes with energy.

Lab tasks

  1. Predict. Choose the uniform-field preset. Before moving anything, use the formula to say whether survival at 6.6 keV is above or below one half.
  2. Change one condition. Drag the energy cursor from 0.5 to 10 keV. Note where the solid curve has its minima.
  3. Compare. In uniform mode the dashed reference is the closed formula above. Check that the two curves lie on top of each other at every energy.
  4. Explain. Lower the coupling slider to an exponent of minus twelve. The dips shrink to a few percent and their positions move. Use the amplitude factor to explain why: once the mixing is small next to the mismatch, the largest possible conversion falls as the square of the coupling.

Exercises

  1. In the short-path limit, by what factor does conversion change if the coupling doubles and the field halves?
  2. For which mismatch Δpl−Δa\Delta_{\rm pl}-\Delta_a is the largest possible conversion exactly one half?
  3. Unpolarized light crosses one uniform field. Show that the surviving light has linear polarization degree Pγ→a/(2−Pγ→a)P_{\gamma\to a}/(2-P_{\gamma\to a}), and evaluate it for the worked example.
Answers
  1. Not at all. The short-path probability depends on the product gaγB⊥g_{a\gamma}B_\perp, which stays the same.
  2. The amplitude factor is 4Δaγ2/[(Δpl−Δa)2+4Δaγ2]4\Delta_{a\gamma}^2/[(\Delta_{\rm pl}-\Delta_a)^2+4\Delta_{a\gamma}^2]. Setting it to one half gives ∣Δpl−Δa∣=2Δaγ\lvert\Delta_{\rm pl}-\Delta_a\rvert=2\Delta_{a\gamma}. The mismatch equals twice the mixing.
  3. The polarization across the field keeps intensity one half. The one along the field keeps (1−Pγ→a)/2(1-P_{\gamma\to a})/2. Their difference divided by their sum is Pγ→a/(2−Pγ→a)P_{\gamma\to a}/(2-P_{\gamma\to a}). For Pγ→a=0.886P_{\gamma\to a}=0.886 this is 0.795, and the remaining light is polarized across the field.

Try it in the Lab: Choose Oscillation in a uniform field and drag the energy cursor.

Sources

  1. Meyer, Horns and Raue, 2013
  2. Mirizzi, Raffelt and Serpico, 2007

Keep reading

What this page links to directly

Searching for axions with cosmic magnetic fields · Reading path

From two mixing states to a published limit

  1. ArticleHow could an invisible particle change a distant spectrum?
  2. You are herePhoton and axion as two mixing states
  3. ArticleMixing in a cluster magnetic field and plasma
  4. ArticleRandom domains, polarization and stellar cooling
  5. ArticleRecompute a cluster sightline from saved inputs
  6. ArticleReading the Chandra NGC 1275 axion limit
Something broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy