Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

M099 · Fluid mechanics

Surface Tension & Capillary Laboratory

Compare five capillary bores, inspect real spherical menisci and switch imposed advancing or receding contact angles. Acquire volume-mean heights to infer the wetting tension.

Interactive modelSurface Tension & Capillary Laboratory
Volume-mean heightReady\text{Ready}
Meniscus centre heightReady\text{Ready}
Contact-line heightReady\text{Ready}
Imposed branch angleReady\text{Ready}
Liquid-minus-gas pressure jumpReady\text{Ready}
Tube Bond numberReady\text{Ready}
Signed vertical tension forceReady\text{Ready}
Force closure residualReady\text{Ready}
Wetting tension inferred from heightsReady\text{Ready}
Tension with independently known angleReady\text{Ready}
Acquired stationsReady\text{Ready}
Raw-coordinate fit residualReady\text{Ready}
Inference statusReady\text{Ready}
Model domainReady\text{Ready}

Physics tutorial

A meniscus as a force balance

BackgroundTwo independent measurement benches share one acquisition workflow; each keeps its own physical law, geometry and validity screen.

Why it mattersConnect physical geometry, reference profiles and a raw sensor record before interpreting an estimate.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
Which liquid height belongs in the force balance?
One-sentence intuition
Infer parameters from independent raw channels and check the approximation domain first.

Core mathematical model

Mean column force balance

ρgπr2h‾=2πrγcos⁡θ\rho g\pi r^2\overline h=2\pi r\gamma\cos\theta

Height is a signed volume mean relative to the maintained reservoir.

Spherical meniscus

h‾=2γcos⁡θρgrΔp=pl−pg=−2γcos⁡θr\begin{aligned}\overline h&=\frac{2\gamma\cos\theta}{\rho gr}\\\Delta p&=p_l-p_g=-\frac{2\gamma\cos\theta}{r}\end{aligned}

The pressure jump is the low-Bond spherical reference; rise and depression reverse its sign.

Gravity compared with capillarity

Bo=ρgr2/γ\mathrm{Bo}=\rho gr^2/\gamma

The spherical shape neglects gravity variation across the meniscus. Acquisition is screened at 0.1; no universal error tolerance is implied.

What the height record identifies

h‾i=b+S/riγcos⁡θ^=ρgS/2\begin{aligned}\overline h_i&=b+S/r_i\\\widehat{\gamma\cos\theta}&=\rho gS/2\end{aligned}

Infer wetting tension with a free height intercept. Dividing by a separately known contact-angle cosine gives tension, except near neutral wetting.

Imposed angle endpoints

θ=clip⁡ ⁣(θ0+bΔθ/2,0∘,180∘)\theta=\operatorname{clip}\!\left(\theta_0+b\Delta\theta/2,0^\circ,180^\circ\right)

The branch is receding, central or advancing. This is an imposed static comparison, not simulated pinning or wetting dynamics.

Common difficulties

Reference versus inference

Typical misconceptionThe estimate can be read without recording data.

Better mental modelClear the record and the estimate disappears. Sensor perturbations can produce nonphysical fits; estimates are not clipped or independently calibrated.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Compare tube radii

    Select Wetting rise; inspect the five menisci and the measurement-station view.

    What to observe: Narrower tubes rise higher. The centre height differs from the volume mean.
  2. 02

    Reverse wetting

    Compare Neutral wetting and Nonwetting depression.

    What to observe: Curvature, signed height and pressure jump change together.
  3. 03

    Compare history endpoints

    Select Angle hysteresis and switch advancing to receding.

    What to observe: The same liquid and radius support different imposed static heights.
  4. 04

    Acquire a tube array

    Acquire eligible tubes, add height perturbations and export CSV.

    What to observe: The affine inverse-radius fit estimates wetting tension; neutral height does not identify tension alone.