Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics
Scattering amplitudes

L2 · Chapter 3

Why split a momentum into two spinors?

The four components of a massless momentum are constrained. Put them in a matrix with zero determinant and it factors into two two-component objects. Their spinor products carry both momentum and spin information, turning long tensor contractions into short factors.

The massless condition removes one degree of freedom

Through the recursion chapter we use four-dimensional spacetime, metric (+,−,−,−)(+,-,-,-) and natural units ℏ=c=1\hbar=c=1. A momentum kμ=(E,kx,ky,kz)k^\mu=(E,k_x,k_y,k_z) satisfies k2=0k^2=0. The determinant of the matrix below is precisely that squared momentum. A nonzero matrix with zero determinant has only one independent column direction, so it factors into a column and a row.

Call these objects λα\lambda_\alpha and λ~α˙\widetilde\lambda_{\dot\alpha}, or Weyl spinors. Each component has units of the square root of energy. They are variables for the same massless momentum, not two additional particles.

kαα˙=(E+kzkx−ikykx+ikyE−kz)=λαλ~α˙,det⁡k=E2−k2=0k_{\alpha\dot\alpha}=\begin{pmatrix}E+k_z&k_x-ik_y\\k_x+ik_y&E-k_z\end{pmatrix}=\lambda_\alpha\widetilde\lambda_{\dot\alpha},\qquad\det k=E^2-\mathbf k^2=0
For complex momentum the spinors are independent. A real-momentum conjugation relation also depends on energy sign and spinor conventions.

Source: Lance J. Dixon · R. Britto

An antisymmetric product retains spin information

The determinant made from two two-component columns changes sign when they are exchanged. This operation defines an angle bracket; square brackets use the corresponding dotted-spinor convention. We use sij=⟨ij⟩[ji]s_{ij}=\langle ij\rangle[ji]. A numerical implementation must fix the square-bracket sign with this identity; conventions from different sources cannot be mixed.

Worked example: take λ1=2E(1,0)\lambda_1=\sqrt{2E}(1,0) and λ2=2E(cos⁡(ϑ/2),sin⁡(ϑ/2))\lambda_2=\sqrt{2E}(\cos(\vartheta/2),\sin(\vartheta/2)). The determinant gives ⟨12⟩=2Esin⁡(ϑ/2)\langle12\rangle=2E\sin(\vartheta/2). Its squared modulus is 2E2(1−cos⁡ϑ)2E^2(1-\cos\vartheta), twice the dot product of equal-energy future-directed null momenta. Near parallel momenta the spinor product vanishes linearly with angle.

⟨ij⟩=λi1λj2−λi2λj1,⟨ij⟩=−⟨ji⟩,sij=2ki⋅kj\langle ij\rangle=\lambda_{i1}\lambda_{j2}-\lambda_{i2}\lambda_{j1},\qquad\langle ij\rangle=-\langle ji\rangle,\qquad s_{ij}=2k_i\cdot k_j
A bracket has units of energy. On a fixed real-momentum branch its modulus is the square root of the absolute value of the corresponding invariant.

Helicity fixes how a candidate must scale

Helicity is spin projected along the direction of motion. A massless gluon has two physical helicities, plus or minus one in units of the reduced Planck constant. An amplitude at fixed helicity may acquire a phase under changes of spinor convention, but its probability remains unchanged.

Multiply one spinor by a nonzero complex number qq and divide its partner by qq. The momentum matrix is unchanged. This is little-group scaling. Physical real-state phase freedom uses ∣q∣=1|q|=1; general complex scaling is its analytic extension. An amplitude for helicity hih_i scales as q−2hiq^{-2h_i}, providing a quick test of a proposed expression.

For a (−−++)(--++) four-gluon amplitude, a cyclic angle-bracket denominator contains each leg twice. A numerator ⟨12⟩4\langle12\rangle^4 adds four powers to legs one and two. Their net weights are positive two; the remaining legs have weight negative two, as required.

λi↦qλi,λ~i↦q−1λ~i⟹An↦q−2hiAn\lambda_i\mapsto q\lambda_i,\quad\widetilde\lambda_i\mapsto q^{-1}\widetilde\lambda_i\quad\Longrightarrow\quad A_n\mapsto q^{-2h_i}A_n
This is a necessary test. Dimensions, singularities and factorization provide further information about the interaction.

Separate the color algebra

Gluons also carry color, an internal quantum label. Its symmetry is non-Abelian: the generator matrices need not commute. Normalize generators by Tr⁡(TaTb)=δab\operatorname{Tr}(T^aT^b)=\delta^{ab}. A tree amplitude becomes a sum of color traces times kinematic partial amplitudes, with coupling gn−2g^{n-2} stripped off. Each partial amplitude keeps a cyclic order.

For order (1,2,3,4)(1,2,3,4), a planar tree can have exchange channels s12s_{12} and s23s_{23}. Cutting out legs 11 and 33 together breaks this cyclic order, so an independent s13s_{13} exchange pole does not occur in this partial amplitude. The full colored amplitude recombines several orders.

All momenta are labeled outgoing. Physical incoming momenta enter with a minus sign, and incoming helicity labels are reversed under the all-outgoing convention. Momentum conservation then states that the sum is zero, making crossing comparisons easier to organize.

An=gn−2∑σ∈Sn/ZnTr⁡(Taσ(1)⋯Taσ(n))An(σ(1),…,σ(n))\mathcal A_n=g^{n-2}\sum_{\sigma\in S_n/Z_n}\operatorname{Tr}(T^{a_{\sigma(1)}}\cdots T^{a_{\sigma(n)}})A_n(\sigma(1),\ldots,\sigma(n))
Cyclically equivalent orders are counted once. A color-ordered partial amplitude is gauge invariant. A cross section requires reconstruction of the full color sum.

Source: Lance J. Dixon

Try the reasoning in an experiment

Test a bracket’s angular scale

  1. Choose the four-point amplitude and keep the polarization reference away from external legs. Predict which adjacent invariant shrinks as leg three moves toward the second incoming beam direction.
  2. Drag the outgoing direction continuously. Compare the diagram sum and compact result, including their errors across the available angles and reference choices.
  3. Use helicity weights to explain the fourth-power numerator, then identify the remaining dimension, pole and normalization checks.

Exercises and explanations

  1. Replace ⟨12⟩4\langle12\rangle^4 by ⟨13⟩4\langle13\rangle^4 with the cyclic denominator unchanged. Which legs now have negative helicity?

    Read the explanation

    Legs one and three. Count the appearances of each leg’s spinor. Changing the numerator changes the external helicity assignment.

  2. Can a five-point color-ordered amplitude have poles in every two-particle channel?

    Read the explanation

    Only cyclically adjacent pairs define such channels in a fixed ordering. There are five of them at five points. Other orderings can contain poles for different pairs.

Sources and reproduced scope

Worked examples and schematic figures are authored for this course. Numerical values are calculated model references. The published comparison recalculates a specified analytic CDD curve; it does not copy experimental data, source artwork or the paper’s numerical optimization points. Source locations and reproduced scope are listed below.

  1. Lance J. Dixon, A brief introduction to modern amplitude methods, arXiv:1310.5353v1 (2013)

    Section 2, equation (5), color decomposition; section 3.1, equations (14), (19), (21)–(27), spinors and all-outgoing conventions; section 3.3, equations (41)–(46), polarizations; section 4.1, equations (55)–(57), soft factors; section 4.3, equations (68)–(70), MHV and collinear factors; sections 4.5 and 5.1, equations (74)–(84), complex three-point seeds and recursion. Our conserving scan and four-point residue example are derived extensions.

  2. R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten, Direct Proof Of Tree-Level Recursion Relation In Yang-Mills Theory, hep-th/0501052v2; Physical Review Letters 94, 181602 (2005)

    Section 2 introduces null-momentum spinors, constructs the shift in equation (2.1), and derives recursion in equation (2.7); section 3 controls large-parameter behavior; section 4 proves the MHV construction. The course keeps Dixon’s overall amplitude phase and specializes the original shift to legs one and four. Its soft scan uses the MHV function as input and derives the conserving real-momentum path separately.

FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy