Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics
Follow a radio pulse across the plasma

AC06 · L1

Why low radio frequencies arrive late

A brief radio flash can reach a telescope as a descending whistle: high frequencies first, low frequencies later. The source need not play those notes in sequence. Free electrons between the source and Earth can turn a simultaneous flash into that sweep.

The space between the stars responds

Imagine sending a short radio pulse through a very thin fog of electric charges. Its electric field pushes the electrons back and forth. Their motion produces another electric field, which combines with the arriving wave. The result is a pulse whose envelope travels a little more slowly than light in a vacuum.

An envelope is the broad rise and fall containing many rapid oscillations. It carries the flash that the telescope times. The individual crests and the envelope have different speeds in this medium. Following a crest would give the wrong arrival time.

At lower radio frequencies the electrons have more time to respond during each cycle. The extra delay grows rapidly toward the low end of the band. Double a frequency and its excess delay relative to infinitely high frequency falls by a factor of four. This frequency dependence is called dispersion.

Reading: Condon & Ransom, Essential Radio Astronomy, Appendix D

A tiny effect accumulates over a long path

Interstellar gas is extremely sparse, but a pulse may cross a great deal of it. Astronomers describe the accumulated electrons by the dispersion measure, usually shortened to DM. Picture a tube extending from the telescope to the source: DM counts the free electrons along that tube, with a conventional astronomical unit.

For a DM of one hundred, a pulse at four hundred megahertz arrives about 1.94 seconds after the same pulse at eight hundred megahertz. A telescope can resolve this difference even when the flash itself lasts only a few milliseconds. Measuring a delay between frequencies also removes the unknown time when the source emitted the flash.

The first public CHIME/FRB catalog contains intensity pictures of these flashes. In such a picture, called a dynamic spectrum, one axis is time and the other is frequency. A curved streak marks successive arrivals. A processed picture may already have the expected sweep removed; its axis labels and processing history tell you which picture you are looking at.

Reading: Condon & Ransom, Essential Radio Astronomy, Chapter 6 · CHIME/FRB first catalog data and waterfall documentation

Why a pulse can keep a tail

A perfectly smooth electron fog delays a narrow pulse without turning every frequency channel into a long echo. Real density fluctuations also bend the waves. Several paths then connect a source to the telescope. The straightest route arrives first, and longer routes add later light.

Those delayed contributions can make a sharp pulse trail off slowly. This is scattering. In a simple thin-screen model the tail decays exponentially, and it becomes longer at lower frequencies. A measured tail also depends on the original pulse shape and the instrument’s time resolution. Estimating the propagation contribution therefore requires a model of the emitted pulse and the instrument.

Reading: Geyer & Karastergiou (2016), revisiting pulsar scattering · Condon & Ransom, Essential Radio Astronomy, Chapter 6

The wave can turn as well as arrive late

A linearly polarized wave has an electric field that oscillates along one direction. A magnetic field along the path makes that direction rotate during propagation. This is Faraday rotation. The angle changes faster at long wavelengths.

Timing counts electrons without caring which way the magnetic field points. Faraday rotation adds a sign: reversing the field reverses the slope of polarization angle against wavelength squared. Together, these measurements can reveal the electron-weighted magnetic field along the path.

The telescope must actually record polarization to do this. A picture containing intensity alone shows when the flash was bright, but it has lost the information about the electric-field direction. The course therefore uses measured CHIME intensity for timing and a separate synthetic polarization experiment for rotation.

Reading: Condon & Ransom, Essential Radio Astronomy, Appendix D · Brentjens & de Bruyn (2005), Faraday Rotation Measure Synthesis, arXiv v2

Try the prediction

Change the material in the path

  1. Predict what will remain unchanged when the magnetic field reverses. Compare the dispersed and reversed-field presets.
  2. Keep the electron column fixed and increase only the scattering tail. Describe which part of the dedispersed pulse changes.

Sources and calculation scope

  1. Condon & Ransom, Essential Radio Astronomy, Appendix D

    D.1–D.2, equations D.14–D.27: cold-plasma group velocity and magnetic rotation. Consulted 28 October 2026. The text uses Gaussian units; the chapter derives the SI delay coefficient separately.

  2. Condon & Ransom, Essential Radio Astronomy, Chapter 6

    Section 6.2, equations 6.44–6.46 and Figure 6.5: dispersion and pulse broadening. The inverse-fourth-power scattering law is a model choice here.

  3. CHIME/FRB first catalog data and waterfall documentation

    The public FRB20180725A example distinguishes wfall from model_wfall. DOI 10.11570/21.0007, catalog version 210806.vFINAL; input range extraction and all array conventions are frozen in the companion provenance file. The historical time-unit label conflicts with the actual millisecond axis; the current tutorial and numerical sample spacing resolve it.

  4. Brentjens & de Bruyn (2005), Faraday Rotation Measure Synthesis, arXiv v2

    Version 2, 2 November 2005. Sections 2, 4 and 6; equations 3–9 and 63–66. Read for Faraday depth, the transfer function, angle aliases and observing-band limits; this is a reading guide and a one-component numerical experiment, not a reproduction of the paper’s sky observations.

  5. Geyer & Karastergiou (2016), revisiting pulsar scattering

    Section 2.1, equations 1–3: the one-sided exponential assumes an infinite isotropic thin screen with a Gaussian angular distribution. Finite and anisotropic screens alter the response.

FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy