Growth sets lengths, not a shape
Efrati, Sharon and Kupferman (2009) start from a disc of gel that shrinks more at its rim than at its centre. Each piece shrinks the same way through the thickness, so the gel has no reason to bend up or down. What it does acquire is a new set of preferred distances between neighbouring points: a target metric.
If some surface in space has those distances, the sheet can take that shape with no strain in its midplane. If none does, every shape the sheet can take is strained somewhere. Efrati et al. call such a sheet a non-Euclidean plate, and they write its elastic energy as a stretching term, measured against the target metric, plus a bending term.
Reading curvature from circles
Take a disc where distances along a radius are unchanged but the ring at radius should have circumference . The target metric is then , Eq. 4.1 of Efrati et al., and its Gaussian curvature is . On a flat sheet and .
The Lab chooses , which gives the same everywhere. For small its rings fall short of by a fraction . A ruler and a tape measure on the sheet are enough to find .
Why no flat sheet can comply
Gauss proved that bending a surface without stretching it never changes its Gaussian curvature, because that curvature is fixed by lengths measured within the surface. A flat sheet has , and no amount of bending without stretching can give it . Lying flat, it must stretch.
The sphere of radius does have the target lengths: the ring at distance from the pole, measured along the surface, has radius . So the disc can avoid stretching by becoming a zone of that sphere, a cap. That cap is still bent, so it still stores energy: Efrati et al. stress that a non-Euclidean plate has no state free of stress. Its mirror image, the cap turned inside out, has the same lengths and the same bending, so it is an equally good choice.
A curved sheet resists being flattened
Once the sheet has curved, the same argument makes it stiff. Push a spherical shell of radius inward by and every ring gets shorter by a fraction . That is stretching, and it costs energy in proportion to , far more than bending a flat plate by the same amount.
Pandey et al. (2014) use exactly this extra term in their Eq. 9 for vibrating spherical caps, the toy poppers that leap off a table. In the Lab, turning the cap inside out first raises its energy to about six times that of the cap, because every shape in between misses the target lengths.
Worked example
The Lab’s disc at full growth
The Lab’s disc is the ring , asked for . Its outer rim should be long; a flat rim at radius 1.1 is . The target is 19.0 % short, close to the small-curvature estimate . Its target area, , is 9.8 % less than the flat ring’s 3.770.
The stretch-free option is the zone of the unit sphere between polar distances 0.1 and 1.1. Its height is . In the Lab, the thin preset ends as a dome 0.999 as high as this cap. For Efrati et al.’s gel, is the curvature of a sphere of radius .