Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

O067 · AC22 · A point that turns

Direct Imaging beside Stellar Glare

Is that faint point a companion or a speckle? A companion follows the rotating sky; instrumental speckles tend to stay with the pupil. Subtracting the stellar halo also removes companion light and mixes spectral channels. Known-source injections measure that response. Noise, position and PSF uncertainty determine how well the spectrum can be recovered.

Watch a faint source turn through a fixed stellar halo, then measure how subtracting that halo changes its spectrum.

Interactive modelDirect Imaging beside Stellar Glare
Rotation displacement4.23 λref/D4.23\,\lambda_{\rm ref}/D
Processed aperture response0.6870.687
Extracted middle-channel contrast0.001240.00124
Nominal comparison-ring statistic189189

The residual and spectrum use the same synthetic detector frames. The dashed spectrum shows the prescribed input for comparison.

After subtraction and derotation
Recovered contrast spectrum
Each injected band changes the output
What the uncertainty includes

The aperture estimate conditions on the chosen source position and adopted PSF. Mean-ADI and mean-SDI photon propagation is exact for their fixed numerical operators. Data-dependent KLIP uses finite source-photon resampling with its basis recomputed. Neither removes uncertainty in a covariance estimated from a few correlated comparison patches. The course tests this with independent complete acquisitions, a spatial–spectral position profile and PSF mismatch.

Physics tutorial

Follow the point, then account for the light

BackgroundA coronagraph reduces the bright on-axis stellar field before the camera. Residual optical-path errors still scatter coherent starlight into a speckled halo.

Why it mattersA faint point becomes persuasive when its motion and its processed flux agree with the same optical model.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
How much of a companion survives subtracting a reference made from its own images?
One-sentence intuition
A reduction acts on the source as well as the halo. Calibrate the complete operator, including its source-dependent reference, before interpreting a spectrum.

Core mathematical model

Optical-path error makes phase

ϕλ=2πW/λ\phi_\lambda=2\pi W/\lambda

Path error and wavelength use the same length unit. Path error is not mirror surface displacement.

Count photons before subtracting

Dtℓp∼Poisson⁡ ⁣[N⋆(p⋆,tℓp+cℓps,tℓp)+b]+N(0,σr2)D_{t\ell p}\sim\operatorname{Poisson}\!\left[N_\star(p_{\star,t\ell p}+c_\ell p_{{\rm s},t\ell p})+b\right]+\mathcal N(0,\sigma_{\rm r}^2)

The camera PSFs retain coronagraph and finite-field losses; they are not renormalized to unit transmitted flux.

Calibrate a coupled spectrum

c^=(ATC−1A)−1ATC−1y\widehat{\boldsymbol c}=(A^{\mathsf T}C^{-1}A)^{-1}A^{\mathsf T}C^{-1}\boldsymbol y

The response columns come from separate channel injections before all processing. Singular response directions cannot be measured by this inverse.

Common difficulties

A bright residual is not a probability

Typical misconceptionA large local statistic directly gives the probability that a planet is real.

Better mental modelComparison samples are few and correlated; a blind search adds trials. The tutorial keeps the nominal statistic separate from null experiments.

A known injection does not create new observations

Typical misconceptionAdding an empirical PSF to a real cube simulates an independent observation with all its noise.

Better mental modelIt measures conditional processing response on that frozen background. Independent photon and speckle realizations need separate simulations.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Watch a rotating source

    Open A companion turns. Drag its hollow cyan handle; the source is a synthetic input, not a detected position marker.

    What to observe: The sampled camera source follows the same field rotation used in derotation.
  2. 02

    Lose most of its light

    Choose Almost no rotation, then compare the processed aperture response.

    What to observe: A reference sees nearly the same source in every frame, so subtraction removes nearly all of it.
  3. 03

    Mix the channels

    In the advanced group choose spectral plus angular subtraction and inspect the response matrix.

    What to observe: An injection into one band can change several extracted bands; diagonal throughput correction alone misses that effect.

Related experiments and articles

From stellar glare to a companion spectrum · Reading path

From stellar glare to a companion spectrum

Articles on this path that use this experiment, followed by the other experiments they suggest.

  1. ArticleThe faint point that turns beside a star
  2. ArticleFrom a pupil wave to counted camera pixels
  3. ArticleWhy subtracting a halo also subtracts a companion
  4. ArticleRecover a spectrum without losing its uncertainty
  5. ArticleExtract a contrast spectrum from three GPI exposures
  6. ArticleRead the papers that separate speckles from companions
FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy