Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

Optics 060 · Diffraction, Fourier optics, and computational imaging

Diffractive Lens Workshop

How does a diffractive lens focus light, and what do finer phase steps improve? Zone spacing fixes the focal length of each diffraction order, and longer wavelengths focus closer, the opposite of a glass lens. Finer phase steps send more of the light into the main focus: two levels manage about 41 percent, and the closer the profile gets to a smooth kinoform, the closer it gets to all of it. More steps leave the color error unchanged.

Build an amplitude zone plate, a binary or multilevel phase relief and a continuous kinoform on one bench with a moving sensor. Record focal pixels through each finite ring-shaped pupil, then compare the multiple foci, the efficiency of each order, the relief depth and the chromatic shift, which runs opposite to that of a smooth refractive lens.

Interactive modelDiffractive Lens Workshop
Nominal primary focus / actual sensor distance f1,zf_1,z0.500.50
Ideal transmission or primary-order power / finite-window power T,η1,PwindowT,\eta_1,P_{\rm window}50%50\%
Physical aperture radius / full-wave relief depth a,h2πa,h_{2\pi}0.00π0.00\pi
Model regimevalid model regime\text{valid model regime}

Physics tutorial

Audit the physics of Diffractive Lens Workshop

BackgroundEach Fresnel half-zone advances the propagation phase to the axial focus by half a cycle: rj2=jλ0f0r_j^2=j\lambda_0f_0. Blocking every other zone keeps them from cancelling. A phase relief instead rotates their amplitudes so that they add.

Why it mattersHow does a diffractive lens focus light, and what do finer phase steps improve?

Start with the essentials

Focus question
How does a diffractive lens focus light, and what do finer phase steps improve?
One-sentence intuition
One fixed diffractive plate can have many nominal foci: fm(λ)=f0λ0mλf_m(\lambda)=\frac{f_0\lambda_0}{m\lambda}. A longer wavelength brings every positive-order focus closer. The power in an order is not its peak height on the axis. Negative orders diverge, and the zero order has no finite focus.

Core mathematical model

Zone layout of the fabricated plate

q=r22λ0f0,0≤q≤Ka2=2Kλ0f0h2π=λ0/(n0−1)\begin{aligned}q&=\frac{r^2}{2\lambda_0 f_0},\quad 0\le q\le K\\a^2&=2K\lambda_0f_0\\h_{2\pi}&=\lambda_0/(n_0-1)\end{aligned}

Every full period has the same area. Changing the whole number of periods changes the real aperture radius, not just how many rings are drawn. The design focal length moves every boundary. The source colour never changes the plate once it is made.

Glass relief adds positive phase

t(r,λ)=exp⁡ ⁣[2πiλ(n(λ)−1)h(r)]hkin=shh2π(1−{q})hM=shh2πM(M−1−⌊M{q}⌋)\begin{aligned}t(r,\lambda)&=\exp\!\left[\frac{2\pi i}{\lambda}(n(\lambda)-1)h(r)\right]\\h_{\rm kin}&=s_hh_{2\pi}(1-\{q\})\\h_M&=\frac{s_hh_{2\pi}}M\left(M-1-\lfloor M\{q\}\rfloor\right)\end{aligned}

At the design wavelength, the staircase stepping down toward the edge approximates the negative quadratic phase of a focusing lens, apart from a common phase that does not matter. The binary plate uses two levels; the continuous kinoform wraps the phase every full cycle. Thickness errors move power between orders, even though the nominal focal positions of the orders stay fixed.

Propagating the field through the real rings

U(ρ,z)=2πiλzeikz+ikρ2/(2z)⋅∫0at(r)eikr2/(2z)J0(kρr/z)r drI=∣U∣2\begin{aligned}U(\rho,z)&=\frac{2\pi}{i\lambda z}e^{ikz+ik\rho^2/(2z)}\\&\quad\cdot\int_0^a t(r)e^{ikr^2/(2z)}J_0(k\rho r/z)r\,dr\\I&=|U|^2\end{aligned}

The integral runs over the exact annular regions of the finite circular pupil; no Lorentzian or Gaussian focus shape is assumed. The on-axis integral is analytic, and the same pupil gives the pixel averages off axis. The three source lines are mutually incoherent, so their intensities add. The reference is a separate propagation, not a reconstruction from selected pixels.

Power in each diffraction order

cm=∫01t(u)e2πimu duη1amp=1π2η1binary=4π2η1(M)=[sin⁡(π/M)π/M]2\begin{aligned}c_m&=\int_0^1t(u)e^{2\pi imu}\,du\\\eta_1^{\rm amp}&=\frac1{\pi^2}\\\eta_1^{\rm binary}&=\frac4{\pi^2}\\\eta_1^{(M)}&=\left[\frac{\sin(\pi/M)}{\pi/M}\right]^2\end{aligned}

These efficiencies hold for an ideal pupil of complete periods at the design wavelength and depth. A binary plate sends power into both converging and diverging odd orders. An amplitude plate also absorbs half the light and leaves a zero order. A higher-order focus is smaller, so it can reach a similar axial peak with less power.

Power on a finite sensor

Ip=1p2∫pixel∣U∣2 dAPwindow=p2∑pIpπa2Iinc∑m=−∞∞ηm=∫01∣t(u)∣2 du\begin{aligned}I_p&=\frac1{p^2}\int_{\rm pixel}|U|^2\,dA\\P_{\rm window}&=\frac{p^2\sum_p I_p}{\pi a^2 I_{\rm inc}}\\\sum_{m=-\infty}^{\infty}\eta_m&=\int_0^1|t(u)|^2\,du\end{aligned}

The small square sensor can miss unfocused light and diffraction rings. The sum over infinitely many ideal orders is not what a finite window measures. Only fifteen orders are plotted, and the rest are not quietly counted as absorbed. Irradiance is scaled to the design peak of a perfect full pupil, never to the brightest pixel at the moment.

Opposite chromatic shifts

f1DOE=f0λ0/λfref=f0n0−1n(λ)−1ϵF≃ka48z3\begin{aligned}f_1^{\rm DOE}&=f_0\lambda_0/\lambda\\f^{\rm ref}&=f_0\frac{n_0-1}{n(\lambda)-1}\\\epsilon_{\rm F}&\simeq\frac{ka^4}{8z^3}\end{aligned}

With normal glass dispersion, red light focuses farther away in the smooth thin-lens reference but closer in the fixed diffractive element. The refractive index is interpolated from stated SCHOTT tables. The quartic-phase estimate flags truncation error in the Fresnel approximation at short distances; no vector or spherical-lens accuracy is claimed. Macroscopic refractive Fresnel grooves are outside this model.

Common difficulties

The name Fresnel does not tell you the mechanism

Typical misconceptionAll lenses with concentric grooves are the same, and the brightest focus holds all the transmitted power.

Better mental modelAmplitude blocking, phase wrapping and smooth refraction are different mechanisms. Order power, scanned intensity and the power a finite window actually catches are three different quantities, so compare them separately.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Scene 1: Block alternate zones

    Start with the amplitude plate. Move the sensor through the third-order focus and the primary focus, then look at the opaque alternate zones.

    What to observe: The opaque rings block part of the incoming light. Several peaks appear along the axis, but the zero order has no finite focus.
  2. 02

    Scene 2: Replace absorption with phase

    Switch to binary phase. Look at the half-wave step in the glass, then reduce its depth to zero and watch the converging orders disappear.

    What to observe: An ideal binary phase plate absorbs nothing, yet only about forty percent of the power goes into the primary order.
  3. 03

    Scene 3: Quantization and chromatic focus

    Switch to multilevel. Change the number of levels, try the continuous kinoform, then compare three colours with the smooth refractive reference.

    What to observe: More steps concentrate the power into fewer orders. Changing the wavelength spreads it out again, and the focus shifts with colour in the opposite direction to smooth glass.
FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy