Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

L13 · Axis, wavefront and cavity response

Alignment & Mode Matching

Adjust two steering mirrors and a two-lens telescope. Separate axis errors from size and curvature mismatch, then use a cavity frequency scan to reveal the excited transverse orders.

Interactive modelAlignment & Mode Matching
Fundamental power overlap—\text{—}
Centered wavefront mismatch—\text{—}
Integrated reflected power fraction—\text{—}
Integrated transmitted power fraction—\text{—}
Vertical centroid at cavity entrance—\text{—}
Vertical ray angle at cavity entrance—\text{—}
Incident radius at entrance—\text{—}
Cavity reference radius at entrance—\text{—}
Incident beam parameter real part—\text{—}
Incident beam parameter imaginary part—\text{—}
Total first-order power—\text{—}
Total second-order power—\text{—}
Unresolved power above order 32—\text{—}

Physics tutorial

Align the axis, then match the wavefront

BackgroundA cavity accepts a spatial eigenmode, not simply a bright spot at its center. Displacement, angle, size and phase curvature affect how an incident Gaussian decomposes into that basis.

Why it mattersA power meter can show a disappointing reflection dip even when the spot looks centered. Different controls correct different errors.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
Can steering mirrors repair a centered beam with the wrong size or curvature?
One-sentence intuition
Two steering mirrors independently set position and angle. Two lens powers change the complex beam parameter. Both tasks are needed before a fundamental resonance can accept almost all the input.

Core mathematical model

Steering and lens action

x′=x+dθθmirror′=θ+2δθlens′=θ−x/f\begin{aligned}x^{\prime}&=x+d\theta\\\theta^{\prime}_{\rm mirror}&=\theta+2\delta\\\theta^{\prime}_{\rm lens}&=\theta-x/f\end{aligned}

Distance turns angle into position. Two mirrors at different planes control both; a lens also acts on an off-axis centroid.

A physical Gaussian parameter

q=z−z0+izRzR=πw02/λq′=(Aq+B)/(Cq+D)\begin{aligned}q&=z-z_0+iz_R\\z_R&=\pi w_0^2/\lambda\\q^{\prime}&=(Aq+B)/(Cq+D)\end{aligned}

The real part locates a waist and the imaginary part determines diffraction. Both must match at the cavity entrance.

Cavity target at its input mirror

zR,c=12L(2R−L)qc=−L/2+izR,cwc2=λ∣qc∣2πzR,c\begin{aligned}z_{R,c}&=\tfrac12\sqrt{L(2R-L)}\\q_c&=-L/2+iz_{R,c}\\w_c^2&=\frac{\lambda|q_c|^2}{\pi z_{R,c}}\end{aligned}

The fixed symmetric cavity has its waist halfway between mirrors; the entrance field is converging toward it.

Project fields, not intensities

cmn=∬umn,c∗uin dx dyη00=∣c00∣2∑m,n≥0∣cmn∣2=1\begin{aligned}c_{mn}&=\iint u_{mn,c}^{*}u_{\rm in}\,dx\,dy\\\eta_{00}&=|c_{00}|^2\\\sum_{m,n\ge0}|c_{mn}|^2&=1\end{aligned}

Complex overlap retains curvature and tilt phase. A centered image can still project substantially into even higher orders.

Centered mismatch and alignment limit

ηcentered=4 ℑq ℑqc∣q−qc∗∣2ηwaist=exp⁡ ⁣[−d2w2−k2w2θ24]\begin{aligned}\eta_{\rm centered}&=\frac{4\,\Im q\,\Im q_c}{|q-q_c^{*}|^2}\\\eta_{\rm waist}&=\exp\!\left[-\frac{d^2}{w^2}-\frac{k^2w^2\theta^2}{4}\right]\end{aligned}

The second line is the equal-size common-waist limit, useful for independently checking sensitivity. The general integral also handles simultaneous curvature and axis errors.

Each transverse order has its own resonance

νFSR=c/(2L)Δν⊥=νFSRπarccos⁡(1−L/R)TN=(1−R)2(1−R)2+4Rsin⁡2(ϕN/2)ϕN=2π(Δν−NΔν⊥)νFSR\begin{aligned}\nu_{\rm FSR}&=c/(2L)\\\Delta\nu_{\perp}&=\frac{\nu_{\rm FSR}}{\pi}\arccos(1-L/R)\\\mathcal T_N&=\frac{(1-\mathcal R)^2}{(1-\mathcal R)^2+4\mathcal R\sin^2(\phi_N/2)}\\\phi_N&=\frac{2\pi(\Delta\nu-N\Delta\nu_{\perp})}{\nu_{\rm FSR}}\end{aligned}

Sum the responses weighted by projected power. The two mirrors share power reflectivity; no absorption means total reflection plus transmission is one.

Common difficulties

A centered spot is not a matched field

Typical misconceptionA centered Gaussian intensity image proves good coupling.

Better mental modelTilt and phase curvature are invisible in an intensity image. Use both axis and complex-wavefront diagnostics.

Steering and focusing do different jobs

Typical misconceptionMore mirror adjustment can fix any mismatch.

Better mental modelSteering changes centroid and angle, while lenses change the Gaussian parameter. A centered wavefront error remains after steering.

A reflection dip may belong to another mode

Typical misconceptionEvery dark reflection dip indicates a fundamental resonance.

Better mental modelHigher-order components also resonate at Gouy-shifted frequencies. Check the overlap and the position of the peak.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Recover a displaced axis

    Choose displaced source. Adjust the two mirror pitches, or use correct steering mirrors.

    What to observe: Entrance position and angle both return to zero, and fundamental overlap recovers.
  2. 02

    Find a hidden wavefront error

    Choose aligned but wrong wavefront. Correct steering and compare the centered mismatch.

    What to observe: The axis is already right. Steering does not change the complex beam parameter or the even-order content.
  3. 03

    Match with lenses

    Vary both focal lengths, then search matching lenses for comparison.

    What to observe: The size and curvature converge toward the reference; the search also corrects steering after changing optics.
  4. 04

    Separate frequency from space

    Compare matched but off resonance with spatial mismatch. Scan detuning around several peaks.

    What to observe: Frequency detuning preserves the modal overlap. Spatial mismatch changes the relative heights of transverse-order peaks.