Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

L11 · Shape and mode selection

Transverse Laser Modes

Evolve a finite family of Hermite–Gaussian or Laguerre–Gaussian modes. Move the pump and cavity axis, tighten the aperture, and compare predicted output with an ideal field reference.

Interactive modelTransverse Laser Modes
Evolution time in decay units—\text{—}
Fundamental waist radius—\text{—}
Adjacent transverse-order frequency spacing—\text{—}
Unsaturated candidates above threshold—\text{—}
Modes carrying at least one percent—\text{—}
Dominant output mode—\text{—}
Normalized intracavity power—\text{—}
Largest modal power share—\text{—}
Horizontal output beam quality—\text{—}
Vertical output beam quality—\text{—}
Selected ideal reference—\text{—}
Ideal reference pump threshold—\text{—}
Ideal reference two-pass clipping estimate—\text{—}
Horizontal reference beam quality—\text{—}
Vertical reference beam quality—\text{—}
Dominant mode two-pass clipping estimate—\text{—}

Physics tutorial

Diffraction sets the family; pump and loss select the winner

BackgroundLongitudinal modes select oscillation frequency. Transverse modes specify the field shape that reproduces itself through a spherical-mirror cavity. Their nodes and phase come from paraxial diffraction.

Why it mattersA bright donut is not a separate laser principle. It can be one allowed spatial mode selected by where gain is supplied and where light is removed.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
Can changing only the pump footprint change the winning spatial mode?
One-sentence intuition
Modal thresholds depend on gain overlap and aperture loss. Once modes grow, local saturation changes their competition; an ideal reference picture alone does not prove that a mode oscillates.

Core mathematical model

Cartesian fields

umn∝Hm(2X)Hn(2Y)e−(X2+Y2)X=x/w,Y=y/w\begin{aligned}u_{mn}&\propto H_m(\sqrt2 X)\\&\quad H_n(\sqrt2 Y)e^{-(X^2+Y^2)}\\X&=x/w,\quad Y=y/w\end{aligned}

Hermite polynomials create rectangular nodes. The actual implementation normalizes each plane to unit integrated power.

Circular fields

upℓ∝s∣ℓ∣/2Lp∣ℓ∣(s)e−s/2eiℓϕs=2r2/w2\begin{aligned}u_{p\ell}&\propto s^{|\ell|/2}L_p^{|\ell|}(s)\\&\quad e^{-s/2}e^{i\ell\phi}\\s&=2r^2/w^2\end{aligned}

Laguerre polynomials set radial nodes; azimuthal phase winds around the center. The circular family here selects positive helicity.

Mirror boundary and transverse spacing

zR=12L(2R−L)w02=λzR/πΔν⊥=c2πL 2arctan⁡L2zR\begin{aligned}z_R&=\tfrac12\sqrt{L(2\mathcal R-L)}\\w_0^2&=\lambda z_R/\pi\\\Delta\nu_\perp&=\frac{c}{2\pi L}\,2\arctan\frac{L}{2z_R}\end{aligned}

The symmetric cavity fixes the waist and Gouy phase. Each added transverse order shifts the resonance by the displayed spacing; no single longitudinal order is forced.

Local gain competition

Gj=p∫Pρj1+∑lIlρl/ρ0 dAI˙j=(Gj−ℓj)Ijρ0=2/π\begin{aligned}G_j&=p\int\frac{P\rho_j}{1+\sum_l I_l\rho_l/\rho_0}\,dA\\\dot I_j&=(G_j-\ell_j)I_j\\\rho_0&=2/\pi\end{aligned}

Coordinates are in waist-radius units. The pump has peak one, mode densities integrate to one, and the baseline decay time sets the clock. This adiabatic intensity projection omits coherent interference.

Aperture and order penalty

Qj=∫r<aρj dAℓj=1−2ln⁡Qj0.08+ℓNNj\begin{aligned}Q_j&=\int_{r<a}\rho_j\,dA\\\ell_j&=1-\frac{2\ln Q_j}{0.08}+\ell_N N_j\end{aligned}

The aperture is traversed twice each round trip. The integral uses the undeformed field; severe clipping changes eigenmodes and exceeds this model.

Ideal-mode beam quality

HG:Mx2=2m+1My2=2n+1LG:Mx2=My2=2p+∣ℓ∣+1\begin{aligned}\mathrm{HG}:\quad M_x^2&=2m+1\\M_y^2&=2n+1\\\mathrm{LG}:\quad M_x^2&=M_y^2=2p+|\ell|+1\end{aligned}

These are second-moment quality factors. For an incoherent centered modal sum, each axis quality is the power-weighted modal mean; phase information is excluded.

Common difficulties

Allowed is not oscillating

Typical misconceptionEvery displayed ideal mode must appear in the laser.

Better mental modelA mode must overcome its own losses and compete after local saturation; the reference is a separate unit-power field.

A donut does not imply a unique phase

Typical misconceptionAn intensity image establishes azimuthal phase winding.

Better mental modelDifferent mixtures can produce rings. The phase map belongs to the specified ideal LG field, not an inferred phase measurement.

An aperture integral is not a clipped-cavity solver

Typical misconceptionRemoving power leaves the eigenfield exactly unchanged.

Better mental modelThe fixed basis estimates modal loss. Strong clipping or off-axis apertures require field reshaping and coherent mode coupling beyond this projection.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    A narrow pump selects the center

    Evolve the centered fundamental preset for 300 decay times. Compare candidate gain with saturated gain.

    What to observe: The fundamental survives and clamps its gain to its loss.
  2. 02

    Broaden the gain footprint

    Choose the broad pump and evolve for 300 decay times.

    What to observe: More spatial regions retain inversion, allowing several modes to carry power.
  3. 03

    Create a donut without forcing the field

    Choose the ring pump and evolve. Then change the ideal reference orders or phase display.

    What to observe: The circular first azimuthal mode wins from gain overlap. Reference changes leave its output state unchanged.
  4. 04

    Misalign the cavity and restrict the aperture

    Move the entire cavity axis relative to the fixed pump and aperture, then choose the clipped preset.

    What to observe: Gain overlap and transmission both change. A permitted mode may fail threshold; a reference map remains visible even when output is dark.