Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

AC47 · Light, images and selection

From distant light to a galaxy census

A missing blue band can point to a distant galaxy. Follow its light into noisy pixels and a selected count, recompute a bounded real JADES example, then ask what more is needed to infer stars and their formation.

Primary sources and calculation notes

  1. Steidel et al. (1996), Spectroscopic confirmation of a population of normal star-forming galaxies at redshifts above three

    Sections 2–3 and Figure 1: October 1995 Keck/LRIS spectra, colour-selected candidates and the listed spectroscopic galaxy redshifts. No new reconciliation of the paper’s candidate denominators or LF estimate.

  2. Hogg (1999), Distance measures in cosmology

    Luminosity-distance section: bolometric flux, angular/luminosity distance and spectral-density transformations. The numerical examples use the explicitly adopted radiation-free model.

  3. Hogg, Baldry, Blanton & Eisenstein (2002), The K correction

    Equations 1–7 and the AB-reference definition. Keep emitted and observed frequency arguments distinct; the tutorial fixes its reference to 3631 Jy.

  4. STScI, NIRCam filters and mean system throughput

    Four frozen v7 detector-averaged total-system tables: F115W, F150W, F200W and F277W. Original table URLs and SHA256 identities accompany the numerical examples. Throughput is distinct from a PSF or an exposure/noise calibration.

  5. STScI synphot, Photometric properties

    Bandpass weighting and the pivot-wavelength definition; a pivot is a property of the bandpass and does not replace a weighted source integral.

  6. Inoue et al. (2014), An updated analytic model for attenuation by the intergalactic medium

    Introduction and Section 3.1/Figure 5: intergalactic hydrogen and mean Lyman-alpha transmission. The controlled example uses a separate sharp 1216-Angstrom cutoff, not this paper’s full attenuation calculation.

  7. Photutils, PSF photometry

    Finding sources, fixing supplied positions, fitting pixel-integrated profiles and grouping blends. Used to explain why source finding and a known-position flux estimate are different operations.

  8. Sandbox Physics, finite physical-model checks

    Actual 58 finite checks: matched Astropy cosmology, scalar/adaptive photon integrals, finite Gaussian pixels and four 1024-acquisition white-noise tests. Those statistical tests use 0.05 nJy per pixel; the saved five imaging examples use 0.15 nJy.

  9. Sandbox Physics, specified synthetic imaging examples

    Original synthetic examples with exact parameters, distances, native-band totals and saved noisy measurements. No observed galaxy catalog, foreign source ZIP, executable Engine or measured cosmic LF is included.

  10. Sandbox Physics, frozen synthetic response checks

    Original 25-gate response record, including response refinement, finite Gaussian recovery and separate public-catalog count-identity checks. Its fixed source conditions do not calibrate a real survey.

  11. Sandbox Physics, selected-only inference checks

    Accepted 18-gate inference result: independent likelihood, optimum and scores. The first failed original attempt remains historical evidence; the public package uses only the accepted source and selected observations.

  12. Sandbox Physics, selected-count cold replay

    Complete nine-row/six-column calibration at two orders, eight selected counts, six unequal intrinsic bins, original numerical functions and all 401 profile points. Actual cold replay: 39 checks. No hidden parent truth or new draws.

  13. SciPy, Poisson probability and logpmf

    Probability mass function, nonnegative integer support and zero-mean case. The actual independent cold runs fix SciPy 1.17.1; documentation access does not update the execution environment.

  14. Curtis-Lake et al., JADES DR4 Paper I, v2

    Version dated 7 May 2026. Target-read Sections 2.4/3.3/4.5/5, Tables 2/4/10 and equations 1–3. Retain original classes, optimized pointings and the distinction between original selection and updated gold samples.

  15. JADES DR4, twelve original-class fact rows

    Small attributed numerical extract from the exact Combined_DR4_external_v1.2.1.fits Obs_info audit. Original catalog URL/SHA, table conditions and source terms are inside the conditional replay package. No full FITS redistribution.

  16. Sandbox Physics, conditional JADES volume cold replay

    Twelve fact rows, attributed Table 2/4 conditions, original volume functions, all seven horizon checks and retained model-cut/Table 10 mismatches. Actual cold replay 62 checks; conditional target-class scope, not cosmic-average LF.

  17. Madau & Dickinson (2014), Cosmic Star-Formation History

    Sections 3/3.1.1, Figures 2–4 and equation 10: ages, stellar initial mass functions and conditional UV conversion. The illustrative coefficient 1.3e−28 uses constant formation, solar metallicity, age at least about 300 Myr and Salpeter 0.1–100 solar masses; it is distinct from their evolving-population 1.15 choice.

  18. Juodžbalis et al. (2025), JADES broad-line AGN census, v2

    Version 29 April 2025; Figure 1, Section 5.2, Figure 4 and Tables 3–4. Read broad/narrow spectra, nuclear/stellar decomposition, aperture assumptions and compared host-mass routes. No AGN fraction is transferred to the redshift-ten synthetic source; no mass fit is replayed.

  19. Shuntov et al. (2025), COSMOS-Web stellar mass assembly, A&A 695, A20

    Publisher version of record read via DTU Orbit: Sections 2.2/3.2–3.3/6.6 and Figures 1/10/11. Follow population modelling, completeness/AGN handling and simple abundance matching. The baryon fraction is an explicit separate assumption in the scalar example, not a reconstruction of these curves.

  20. Sandbox Physics, explicit stellar-reading scalar examples

    Original AB-normalization, declared UV-to-rate conversion, screen/fraction and assumed-mass efficiency arithmetic only. No SPS, stellar-mass fit or new observations.

FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy