AC08 · Cosmic distance ladder
How the cosmic distance ladder acquires a scale
A nearby geometric distance sets a luminosity scale. Follow that scale through pulsing stars and supernovae, calculate how its uncertainty travels, then reproduce a small published matrix and read the full analysis.
Why a nearby distance changes the scale of the universe
A geometric distance calibrates pulsing stars and supernovae. Follow one small zero-point shift and see why shared errors survive averaging.
02 · L1From inverse-square light to a calibrated stellar distance
Derive magnitudes, distance modulus and the Cepheid period–luminosity relation, with worked numbers and explained calibration exercises.
03 · L2Join Cepheids and supernovae in one distance model
Build the eight-parameter observation model, derive the calibration signs and find the exact absolute-scale degeneracy when the anchor is removed.
04 · L3Fit shared distance errors with a covariance matrix
Derive generalized least squares, transform the Hubble uncertainty and calculate which relative distances cancel a shared anchor error.
05 · L3Reproduce a correlated SH0ES distance-ladder subsystem
Download 87 real observations, their complete selected covariance and a standalone Python fit. Reproduce calibration shifts and a missing-anchor failure.
06 · L4Read the Hubble calibration and its shared uncertainties
Read Riess 2022 sections and figures, trace shared anchors into Cepheid and TRGB comparisons, and separate distance data from early-universe model inference.
Sources and calculation scope
- Riess et al., A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant, arXiv:2112.04510 v 3 (2022)
Sections 2.1 and 4 define the joint model and calibrations. Section 5, Table 5 and Figures 14–16 report the full fit and its correlations; sections 6–7 discuss variants and comparisons. All paper-specific claims here refer to this fixed version.
- PantheonPlusSH0ES DataRelease, commit c447f0fea703fcd0fff57de5000947b5ca81286b
The ally, alll and allc FITS arrays contain 3492 prepared observations,47 parameter columns and the full covariance. The public tutorial retains 87 observations and every nonzero model column they use. The table 2.README explicitly warns against refitting from its diagonal errors.
- Reid, Pesce & Riess, An Improved Distance to NGC4258 and its Implications for the Hubble Constant, arXiv:1908.05625 v 2 (2019)
The geometric maser distance is 7.576 Mpc, with statistical uncertainty 0.082 Mpc and systematic uncertainty 0.076 Mpc. The paper also calibrates the tip of the red giant branch with this anchor, including a discussion of common starting and ending rungs.
- Yuan et al., A New Cepheid Distance to the Maser-Host Galaxy NGC4258, arXiv:2203.06681 v 1 (2022)
Sections 2–4 describe HST observations, Cepheid selection and period–luminosity fitting. The discovery catalogue and the infrared-selected calibration sample have different sizes; the matrix release contains 443 NGC4258 Cepheids.
- Published article license, DOI10.3847/2041-8213/ac 5 c 5 b
The published version of record is registered under CC BY4.0. The source repository has no separate code license. These scientific scripts reimplement the fit and attribute the selected numerical data; no author MCMC code is redistributed.