Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

O052 · Build a planet-sized aperture

Stellar Interferometry and Sparse Imaging

How can a few telescope pairs make an image of the sky? Each telescope pair measures one spatial pattern in the sky. Changing pair directions and observing as Earth turns supplies more patterns. Sparse measurements leave several possible images, so reconstructions combine the signals with stated assumptions about the source.

Move a telescope across Earth, extend the observing track and watch the sampled spatial patterns change. Compare the dirty image with two reconstructions of the same saved signals.

Interactive modelStellar Interferometry and Sparse Imaging
Recorded complex samples5454
Longest projected baseline7.28 Gλ7.28\,\mathrm{G}\lambda
One directed closure phase0.288∘0.288^{\circ}
Smooth-image signal residual7.04 mJy7.04\,\mathrm{mJy}

The same signals permit different pictures

The reconstructions and diagnostics use the saved synthetic signals. The known source is shown as a separate reference. Each image has its own stated intensity normalization.

Sampled baselines; faint dots are conjugates
Dirty beam · unit-peak response
Phase-calibrated dirty image · Jy per beam
Smooth reconstruction · Jy per pixel
Compare the source, another prior and uncalibrated phases
Synthetic source truth · separate reference
Compactness preference · same saved signals
Uncalibrated dirty image · failure diagnostic

Fourier units and reconstruction choices
Vk=∑pxpe−2πi(uklp+vkmp),xp≥0,∑pxp=0.6 JyV_k=\sum_p x_p e^{-2\pi i(u_kl_p+v_km_p)},\qquad x_p\geq0,\quad\sum_p x_p=0.6\,\mathrm{Jy}

Pixels store flux, so the Fourier sum has no extra pixel-area factor. Maps display east left and north up. Dirty maps retain signed sidelobes; reconstructions enforce positivity and the independently saved total flux. Smoothness penalizes neighboring-pixel differences; compactness adds a radius-weighted flux penalty and a small squared-pixel penalty. Ninety accelerated projected-gradient steps are a finite numerical choice.

Physics tutorial

Which parts of the image did the array measure?

BackgroundTwo telescopes compare arriving radio waves. Their projected separation selects a striped pattern on the sky. Several lengths and directions measure different spatial frequencies.

Why it mattersA widely separated array can resolve tiny angular detail, yet most spatial frequencies remain unmeasured. Comparing two reconstructions shows where source assumptions influence the picture.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
Why can two different images predict almost the same measured signals?
One-sentence intuition
The array measures selected Fourier components; reconstruction adds explicit preferences in directions the sampling leaves uncertain.

Core mathematical model

One complex sample

Vk=∑pxpe−2πi(uklp+vkmp)V_k=\sum_p x_p e^{-2\pi i(u_kl_p+v_km_p)}

Each pixel stores flux in jansky. Sky coordinates are east-positive and north-positive radians; baseline coordinates are in wavelengths. Opposite baselines have conjugate signals.

The directed triangle

Φijk=arg⁡(VijVjkVki)\Phi_{ijk}=\arg(V_{ij}V_{jk}V_{ki})

A station phase occurs with both signs when the signals are multiplied around a simultaneous triangle. The first available triangle supplies the readout; station phase errors leave it unchanged.

Fit the signals with a stated preference

min⁡xp≥0, ∑pxp=F[12N∑k∣(Ax)k−yk∣2+R(x)]\min_{x_p\geq0,\,\sum_px_p=F}\left[\frac1{2N}\sum_k|(Ax)_k-y_k|^2+R(x)\right]

Both images read the same separately calibrated record and independent total flux. One penalizes neighboring-pixel differences; the other favors central flux with a small squared-pixel term. The known synthetic source is a separate comparison.

Common difficulties

A sharp image can still depend on assumptions

Typical misconceptionA small signal residual means every reconstructed feature is measured.

Better mental modelUnsampled spatial frequencies can change the image without changing the saved signals. Compare priors and seek new baselines where their predicted measurements differ.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Move one station

    Use Crossed baselines. Predict how dragging one telescope changes the coverage, then move it and compare the dirty beam.

    What to observe: One moved station changes every baseline connected to it. The signed beam responds to the new set of measured directions.
  2. 02

    Let the ground rotate

    Compare One narrow direction with Let Earth turn. Open the alternate-prior images and compare their long directions.

    What to observe: A longer track supplies additional projected directions and changes which source shapes remain plausible.
  3. 03

    Cancel station phase errors

    Choose Atmospheric phase errors. Compare closure with the default, then inspect the raw and phase-calibrated dirty maps.

    What to observe: The closure survives the station phases. A separate ideal point calibrator restores the complex signals used for the two inversions.

Related experiments and articles

Continue exploring

Measuring the sky

What do positions, colors, interference and radio delays reveal about the sky?

  1. LabObserving Cadence and AliasesMove exposures and compare the rhythms that survive the sampling.
  2. LabSupernova Distances and the Distance LadderMove a geometric distance anchor and follow its shared calibration error.
  3. LabStellar Parallax and Proper MotionChange the stellar distance and follow its annual motion.
  4. LabCrowded-star PhotometryMove the aperture and compare the light admitted from neighbouring stars.
  5. LabStellar Absorption LinesChange the gas temperature and velocity, then compare the absorption lines.
  6. LabGalaxy Colors and Photometric RedshiftCompare redshift, dust and stellar-population effects in the same five bands.
  7. You are hereStellar Interferometry and Sparse ImagingMove a telescope and compare images fitted to the same sparse signals.
  8. LabInterstellar Radio PropagationChange the electron column and field, then follow the arriving radio pulse.

From telescope pairs to sky images · Reading path

From telescope pairs to sky images

Articles on this path that use this experiment, followed by the other experiments they suggest.

  1. ArticleHow scattered telescopes make an image
  2. ArticleFrom wave delay to complex visibility
  3. ArticleEarth rotation and closure phase
  4. ArticleDirty beams and nonunique images
  5. ArticleFit a real EHT closure triangle
  6. ArticleRead EHT imaging and dynamic priors

Astronomy and gravity · Reading path

Learning to read radio signals

Articles on this path that use this experiment, followed by the other experiments they suggest.

  1. ArticleHow Ryle built a large radio telescope from smaller ones
FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy