Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

E46 · Environmental electron microscopy

Environmental-cell TEM: Bubbles and Pressure

How do pressure and beam-driven bubbles change an environmental TEM image? Gas scatters electrons out of the selected image channel and can dim the image. A beam-produced bubble replaces liquid, shortening the liquid path and making that region brighter. Brightness therefore depends on what the electrons pass through. A clearer movie alone cannot establish that a reaction is less disturbed; dose and flow controls are needed.

See a beam-driven bubble replace liquid, then switch to gas and measure pressure from transmitted counts. Compare both with the retained liquid-reaction movie.

Interactive modelEnvironmental-cell TEM: Bubbles and Pressure
Count-derived radius, pressure or rate—\text{—}
Difference from known input—\text{—}
Mean counts per sampled pixel—\text{—}
Model selected-channel transmission—\text{—}
More measurements and target
Known input reference—\text{—}
Beam to intrinsic hazard ratio—\text{—}
Selected exposure midpoint—\text{—}
Exposure duration—\text{—}
Total incident areal dose—\text{—}
Usable sampled frames—\text{—}
Assumed radiolysis species · dimensionless—\text{—}
Retained mean gas inventory · molecules—\text{—}
Gas inventory removed by liquid renewal—\text{—}
Numerical molecule-balance residual—\text{—}
Experiment target—\text{—}

Physics tutorial

Environmental-cell TEM: Bubbles and Pressure

BackgroundTwo thin windows keep liquid or gas inside a TEM cell. Electrons can scatter out of the selected image channel in that medium. In liquid, the beam can also produce gas: a bubble replaces part of the liquid path and makes that part of the image brighter. The cell and the recorded counts must describe the same path.

Why it mattersIn the bubble example, infer the selected radius within 15 percent or 0.5 nm, whichever is larger, from at least four resolved exposures. Keep all 24 exposures complete and collect at least 8 mean counts per pixel. In gas, infer pressure within 10 percent or 2 kPa, with conditional counting uncertainty at most 2 kPa and at least 8 counts per pixel. The retained reaction preset has its separate rate target: 10 percent error, beam hazard at most 8 percent of intrinsic hazard, 20 usable frames, 35 percent intrinsic conversion and an exposure-integrated fit; intrinsic rate times frame interval must be at most 0.2.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
How do pressure and beam-driven bubbles change an environmental TEM image?
One-sentence intuition
A bright region can appear because a bubble has replaced liquid. It need not mean that the specimen became easier to observe without disturbing it.

Core mathematical model

Count the gas before creating a nucleus

N˙g=ygJonAN˙d=N˙g−νNd−N˙b\begin{aligned}\dot N_g&=y_gJ_{\rm on}A\\\dot N_d&=\dot N_g-\nu N_d-\dot N_b\end{aligned}

The dissolved inventory supplies the bubble and loses gas through liquid renewal. The predetermined nucleus appears only when that inventory can supply both the seed and its equilibrium dissolved gas. This rule is assigned; it does not calculate a nucleation barrier.

Bubble inventory and internal pressure

Pb=Pext+2γ/RNb=PbkBT4πR33\begin{aligned}P_b&=P_{\rm ext}+2\gamma/R\\N_b&=\frac{P_b}{k_BT}\frac{4\pi R^3}{3}\end{aligned}

The bubble is a pinned sphere. Its gas follows an ideal equation of state; exchange uses a linear Henry relation. Both are teaching extrapolations at the large internal pressure of a small bubble. The model stops before the sphere touches a window or reaches the lateral bound.

A bubble shortens the liquid path

c(r)={2R2−r2r<R0r≥Rℓl(r)=L−c(r)T(r)=e−2w/Λw−ℓl(r)/Λl\begin{aligned}c(r)&=\begin{cases}2\sqrt{R^2-r^2}&r<R\\0&r\ge R\end{cases}\\\ell_l(r)&=L-c(r)\\\mathcal T(r)&=e^{-2w/\Lambda_w-\ell_l(r)/\Lambda_l}\end{aligned}

Only points inside the projected circle lose a liquid chord. Each frame averages these transmissions over its actual exposure. A spatial count fit estimates one exposure-equivalent radius from known center and thickness calibrations. An unresolved profile is not proof of zero dissolved gas.

Pressure from calibrated transmission

τ^g=−ln⁡(N‾/Nwin)P^=kBTσLgτ^gNwin=ηJp2Δt e−2w/Λw\begin{aligned}\widehat\tau_g&=-\ln(\overline N/N_{\rm win})\\\widehat P&=\frac{k_BT}{\sigma L_g}\widehat\tau_g\\N_{\rm win}&=\eta Jp^2\Delta t\,e^{-2w/\Lambda_w}\end{aligned}

The gas number density follows the ideal-gas law. Pressure requires an independently known gas path, cross-section and window transmission. The plotted pressure curve is that calibration; the measured point comes from counts at the applied pressure. Thickness uncertainty and nonideal gas effects are omitted.

Radiolysis products: production and renewal

c˙=αJon−(β+ν)cH˙=k0+γc\begin{aligned}\dot c&=\alpha J_{\rm on}-(\beta+\nu)c\\\dot H&=k_0+\gamma c\end{aligned}

The radiolysis products are lumped into one dimensionless species. The Lab does not solve water chemistry.

Conversion measured from counts

u^=1−N‾/NflatCNflat=ηJp2Δt T\begin{aligned}\widehat u&=\frac{1-\overline N/N_{\rm flat}}{C}\\N_{\rm flat}&=\eta Jp^2\Delta t\,\mathcal T\end{aligned}

The flat-field level and the contrast are known calibrations, and the fraction is computed from the recorded counts themselves.

Fitting a rate to finite exposures

u‾(k)=1−e−kt01−e−kΔtkΔtu(t)=1−e−H(t)\begin{aligned}\overline u(k)&=1-e^{-kt_0}\frac{1-e^{-k\Delta t}}{k\Delta t}\\u(t)&=1-e^{-H(t)}\end{aligned}

Each frame averages the conversion over its exposure, and the fit matches one constant apparent rate to those averages. A good fit does not prove a thermal cause.

Electrons lost from the selected channel

T=exp⁡ ⁣(−LΛl−2wΛw)\mathcal T=\exp\!\left(-\frac{L}{\Lambda_l}-\frac{2w}{\Lambda_w}\right)

The assumed effective lengths describe electrons leaving the selected image channel, which is not the same as being absorbed.

Common difficulties

Brighter is not always less perturbed

Typical misconceptionA bright patch means that the original liquid specimen is easier to measure.

Better mental modelA bubble can brighten the image because it replaces liquid along the electron path. Gas formation has changed the cell itself. The known-input radius curve is separate from the count-derived fit; neither establishes a rate for an unperturbed reaction. Use independent dose, flow and thickness calibration.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Track a bubble made by the beam

    Compare The beam makes a bubble with Renewal suppresses the bubble. Move through stored exposures in the advanced controls.

    What to observe: Renewal removes dissolved gas and can prevent a visible bubble while leaving the windows unchanged. The image fit can resolve a radius only after a spatial bubble signal emerges.
  2. 02

    Reach the window and stop

    Choose The bubble reaches a window, then try a long exposure and a larger gas yield.

    What to observe: The model stops before invalid sphere geometry. A shortened final exposure keeps its true duration and count budget; the 24-complete-exposure target fails.
  3. 03

    Measure gas pressure

    Choose Gas pressure removes counts and drag the gold pressure handle. Compare with Pressure hidden by lost counts.

    What to observe: Higher pressure removes electrons from the selected channel. Known path and window calibrations let the remaining counts estimate pressure; too few counts leave it unresolved.
  4. 04

    Keep reaction kinetics separate

    Choose Fit the liquid reaction rate. In this retained branch, adjust flux, cadence, renewal and drift processing.

    What to observe: This branch measures conversion in a separate prescribed reaction model. The beam can bias its apparent rate even when the movie looks cleaner; its cause plot and rate target remain separate from bubble-radius and pressure inference.
FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy