Earliest direct light in homogeneous ice
For an infinite track at vacuum light speed, l is the sensor displacement along the track and d the perpendicular distance. A nondispersive index 1.32 is assumed, so phase and group speeds coincide.
Neutrinos · D12 · The inverse problem
Generate a teaching event in an ice array, hide its true direction, and fit the sensor times. Change scattering and absorption to see when a bright event becomes harder to reconstruct.
TEACHING SIMULATION · RECORDED DATA
Preparing a reproducible teaching record…
Physics tutorial
BackgroundCoordinates are local Cartesian metres: z points upward, x and y are horizontal. Polar angle is measured from positive z; azimuth turns from x toward y. The reference point is assumed known, as in a constrained calibration exercise.
Why it mattersHow much direction information survives absorption and scattering?
Start with the essentials
For an infinite track at vacuum light speed, l is the sensor displacement along the track and d the perpendicular distance. A nondispersive index 1.32 is assumed, so phase and group speeds coincide.
The time offset is profiled as the mean difference for each trial direction. A global coarse angular grid is refined locally. Late scattered photons can bias this deliberately simple direct-light fit; RMS is a residual diagnostic, not angular uncertainty.
Typical misconceptionThe fitted charged-particle direction is the exact neutrino direction.
Better mental modelInteraction kinematics are omitted. This is a charged-track timing exercise with a known anchor, not an event classifier, neutrino-energy measurement or full IceCube reconstruction.
Generate an event with truth hidden. Fit recorded hits, then reveal truth.
What to observe: The fitted arrow and angular error are calculated after fitting; the fitter never reads the generated direction.Choose Strong scattering. Fit the new event and compare timing residuals.
What to observe: Early unscattered photons may still carry direction information, but delayed first hits can bias the fit.Choose Strong absorption and compare hit count and residuals across several generated events.
What to observe: Fewer sensors constrain the fit. This display does not supply a calibrated confidence interval or guarantee a monotonic error increase in every random event.