Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

Q035 · Timing photons at two detectors

HBT Photon Correlation

How can you tell equally bright light sources apart by the way their photons arrive? Coincidences between two detectors at zero delay tell them apart. Coherent light, such as a laser, arrives at random, and the correlation stays flat. Thermal light bunches, giving extra coincidences. A single emitter antibunches, because it cannot emit two photons at once.

Split the light from one source between two independent detectors. Collect arrival times and build the correlation curve for coherent light, thermal light in temporal modes and a single emitter.

Interactive modelHBT Photon Correlation
Recorded clicksN=0N=0
Sampled central correlation—\text{—}

02 / Follow the evidence

From two clocks to one correlation curve

How a pair of clicks enters the curve

This bin, pooled over every recorded A click:

g^AB=pairsaccidentals\widehat g_{AB}=\frac{\text{pairs}}{\text{accidentals}}

Click the curve to inspect a delay bin. One means independent arrivals.

Blue: sampled A–B pairs; whiskers: one record-jackknife standard error. Gray: separate detector reference, omitted with dead time. Orange: optional A–A correlation. All values average over finite delay bins.

Numerical results & model checks

Central correlation / one standard error

—\text{—}

Central pairs / estimated accidentals

—\text{—}

Measured A / B count rates

—\text{—}

Detector model central reference

—\text{—}

Raw records & scientific boundary

Thermal modes are rectangular in time with independent exponential intensities, not a broadband blackbody spectrum. The single-emitter reference has equal incoherent pump and decay rates. Timestamps receive independent uniform jitter after each detector’s dead-time decision. Finite-window overlap is included; estimated rates still introduce finite-record bias. The error bars are approximate sampling errors, not significance certificates.

Independent records. The latest one is replayed above.
Latest 12 clicks; CSV includes every click and each exposure

Primary references: Wineland · Nobel lecture · Kimble et al. · 1977 · quED · HBT

03 / Equally bright sources with different arrival patterns

Put three sources side by side

Eight independent records per source. The flux and detector settings are held fixed. Open any result to inspect and export its actual timestamps.

Single emitter

Needs time to excite again

—\text{—}

Coherent light

Independent arrivals

—\text{—}

Thermal modes

Fluctuating intensity groups arrivals

—\text{—}

Ready to compare using the current detector settings.

Physics tutorial

Build an HBT correlation

BackgroundTwo sources can be equally bright and still deliver photons in very different patterns.

Why it mattersYou learn about the source by reasoning step by step from individual detector clicks.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
Do photons prefer arriving together?
One-sentence intuition
Draw conclusions from the recorded clicks first, and only then compare them with the model.

Core mathematical model

Units of time and rate

τ=t/t∗,r,γ,s,k,b,Φ in t∗−1\tau=t/t_*,\qquad r,\gamma,s,k,b,\Phi\ \text{in}\ t_*^{-1}

The reference time is arbitrary and is not tied to any atom or real lifetime. All times, rates and CSV values are given in this unit.

Normally ordered correlation

g(2)(τ)=⟨:I(t)I(t+τ):⟩⟨I⟩2g^{(2)}(\tau)=\frac{\langle :I(t)I(t+\tau):\rangle}{\langle I\rangle^2}

A photon is never paired with itself. The splitter sends each photon to exactly one output, so the two detectors register pairs of different photons.

The three light sources

gcoherent(2)=1,gthermal(2)=1+max⁡(0,1−∣τ∣/tc),gemitter(2)=1−e−4Φ∣τ∣g^{(2)}_{\rm coherent}=1,\quad g^{(2)}_{\rm thermal}=1+\max(0,1-|\tau|/t_c),\quad g^{(2)}_{\rm emitter}=1-e^{-4\Phi|\tau|}

Coherent light arrives as a Poisson process. Thermal light is a train of independent flat modes that start at a random time; each mode has an exponentially distributed intensity and a geometric photon count. The two-level emitter has equal pump and decay rates, each twice the mean flux. The shape of the thermal peak belongs to this mode model.

Counting pairs from timestamps

Cj=∑a∈A∑b∈B1{tb−ta∈Bj},Ej=r^Ar^B∫Bj(T−∣τ∣)+ dτC_j=\sum_{a\in A}\sum_{b\in B}\mathbf1\{t_b-t_a\in B_j\},\quad E_j=\widehat r_A\widehat r_B\int_{B_j}(T-|\tau|)_+\,d\tau

Each independent record gets its own overlap and its own estimate of accidental pairs from the measured rates. Events from different records are never paired. The central bin covers both negative and positive delays.

Pooled estimate and uncertainty

g^j=∑mCjm∑mEjm,SEjack2=M−1M∑m(g^j,(−m)−g‾j,(−))2\widehat g_j=\frac{\sum_m C_{jm}}{\sum_m E_{jm}},\qquad {\rm SE}_{\rm jack}^2=\frac{M-1}{M}\sum_m(\widehat g_{j,(-m)}-\overline g_{j,(-)})^2

The jackknife standard error leaves out one record at a time and needs at least three independent records. It is an approximate sampling error and guarantees no confidence level. Estimating rates from finite records adds a bias, and pairs that share a photon are not independent Poisson observations.

Effect of background and timing jitter

gAB(2)−1=SASB(SA+b)(SB+b)(gsource(2)−1),SA=RηΦ, SB=(1−R)ηΦg_{AB}^{(2)}-1=\frac{S_AS_B}{(S_A+b)(S_B+b)}(g_{\rm source}^{(2)}-1),\quad S_A=R\eta\Phi,\ S_B=(1-R)\eta\Phi

The detector reference averages this excess correlation over the delay bin and over the triangular spread of the difference between two independent uniform jitters. Independent background lowers the contrast. With dead time on, the reference is hidden because it ignores the detector's memory of earlier clicks.

Dead time is a detector effect

tn+1accepted−tnaccepted≥tdbefore timestamp jittert_{n+1}^{\rm accepted}-t_n^{\rm accepted}\ge t_d\quad\text{before timestamp jitter}

Each detector recovers on its own, and arrivals it rejects do not extend its dead time. For coherent light, compare A–A with A–B: a dip in a single channel can come from the instrument. The A–A estimate excludes self-pairs and is normalized by the factorial count.

Common difficulties

A dip does not prove a quantum source

Typical misconceptionAny dip in the curve proves the source is nonclassical.

Better mental modelBefore drawing that conclusion, check both channels, the background, the timing resolution and the detector dead time.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Match brightness

    Keep the mean flux fixed while switching sources.

    What to observe: The average count rate alone cannot tell the photon statistics apart.
  2. 02

    Collect more records

    Collect eight independent records and look at the correlation in the central bin.

    What to observe: The error bars come from the spread between independent records.
  3. 03

    Test the detector

    Select the dead-time case and compare same-channel and cross-channel curves.

    What to observe: The detector alone can make a single channel look antibunched.

Related experiments and articles

Probes and measurement · Reading path

Controlled light and precision measurement

Articles on this path that use this experiment, followed by the other experiments they suggest.

  1. ArticleGlauber’s coherence theory goes beyond interference fringes
  2. LabInjection LockingWatch a relative phase settle or slip
FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy