Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

M055 · Torque on a spinning rigid body

Gyroscope Precession Bench

Why does a spinning wheel precess instead of simply falling? Because gravity's torque on the wheel points sideways, not down. A torque changes angular momentum in its own direction, so the wheel's large spin angular momentum swings around the vertical instead of tipping over. Energy, the angular momentum about the vertical and the spin along the axle all stay constant during the motion.

Release a spinning flywheel held at one pivot, start it on either steady-precession branch, reverse its spin or switch gravity off. Follow the angular-momentum and torque arrows in three dimensions, measure the nutation and compare the full motion with the slow-precession estimate.

Interactive modelGyroscope Precession Bench
Reviewed timePending\text{Pending}
Axis tiltPending\text{Pending}
Instantaneous precessionPending\text{Pending}
Nutation ratePending\text{Pending}
Physical axial spinPending\text{Pending}
Slow-precession estimatePending\text{Pending}
Exact slow branchPending\text{Pending}
Prepared initial statePending\text{Pending}
Rotational kinetic energyPending\text{Pending}
Gravitational potentialPending\text{Pending}
Total energyPending\text{Pending}
Vertical angular momentumPending\text{Pending}
Axial angular momentumPending\text{Pending}
Gravitational torquePending\text{Pending}
Pivot reaction magnitudePending\text{Pending}
Vertical pivot reactionPending\text{Pending}
Max scaled energy defectPending\text{Pending}
Max scaled momentum defectPending\text{Pending}
Axis difference: two stepsPending\text{Pending}
Upright spin thresholdPending\text{Pending}
Spin / upright thresholdPending\text{Pending}

Physics tutorial

Gyroscope Precession Bench

BackgroundA spinning flywheel is held at one fixed pivot, and you can turn the view around it in three dimensions. Release it freely, start it on either steady-precession branch, reverse the spin or switch gravity off. Follow the angular-momentum and torque arrows, measure the nutation, and compare the full motion with the slow-precession estimate.

Why it mattersThe same rigid-body law explains the flywheel in an instrument and a top that wobbles as it spins. If you watch only the spinning surface, you miss what matters: the axis itself is moving.

Start with the essentials

Focus question
Why does a spinning wheel precess instead of simply falling?
One-sentence intuition
Gravity's sideways torque changes the angular momentum in the fixed frame, yet the energy, the vertical part of the angular momentum and its part along the axis all stay constant.

Core mathematical model

Moments of inertia about the pivot

I3=12mR2,I⊥=14mR2+mℓ2I_3=\frac12mR^2,\qquad I_\perp=\frac14mR^2+m\ell^2

The wheel is a uniform thin disk on a massless shaft, and the distance is measured from the fixed pivot to the disk's centre. The drawn disk thickness, support and hub are only illustrations and carry no mass.

Equations of motion in vector form

L˙=mgℓ ez×n,n˙=L×nI⊥\dot{\mathbf L}=mg\ell\,\mathbf e_z\times\mathbf n,\qquad\dot{\mathbf n}=\frac{\mathbf L\times\mathbf n}{I_\perp}

Every quantity is taken about the fixed pivot. The symmetry axis and the angular momentum in the fixed frame change together, and the spin angle is tracked with a quaternion.

Angular velocity and spin about the axis

ω=LI⊥+(1I3−1I⊥)(L⋅n)n,ω3=ψ˙+ϕ˙cos⁡θ\boldsymbol\omega=\frac{\mathbf L}{I_\perp}+\left(\frac1{I_3}-\frac1{I_\perp}\right)(\mathbf L\cdot\mathbf n)\mathbf n,\qquad\omega_3=\dot\psi+\dot\phi\cos\theta

The physical spin about the axis is not the rate of the Euler spin angle. Mixing the two up gives the wrong condition for exact steady precession.

Two steady-precession branches

I⊥cos⁡θ Ω2−I3ω3Ω+mgℓ=0I_\perp\cos\theta\,\Omega^2-I_3\omega_3\Omega+mg\ell=0

A real root gives a constant tilt only if the wheel starts with no nutation. A kick disturbs that solution. When the axis is horizontal, the equation becomes linear.

Slow-precession approximation

Ωslow≃mgℓI3ω3\Omega_{\mathrm{slow}}\simeq\frac{mg\ell}{I_3\omega_3}

This estimate drops the term with the transverse moment of inertia. It is accurate when the precession is slow compared with the spin about the axis, and it is undefined at zero spin.

Three conserved quantities

E=I⊥2(θ˙2+ϕ˙2sin⁡2θ)+I3ω322+mgℓcos⁡θ,Lz=const,L⋅n=constE=\frac{I_\perp}{2}(\dot\theta^2+\dot\phi^2\sin^2\theta)+\frac{I_3\omega_3^2}{2}+mg\ell\cos\theta,\qquad L_z=\mathrm{const},\quad\mathbf L\cdot\mathbf n=\mathrm{const}

Potential energy is zero when the disk's centre is level with the pivot. The largest errors are divided by nonzero energy and angular-momentum scales of the system, so they still mean something when a conserved quantity is itself zero.

Upright stability threshold

∣I3ω3∣>2I⊥mgℓ|I_3\omega_3|>2\sqrt{I_\perp mg\ell}

This is a linear stability condition for small tilts near vertical. Below the threshold, perfectly vertical spinning is still an exact solution; add a small tilt to see that it is unstable.

Force from the pivot

R=mℓn¨+mgez\mathbf R=m\ell\ddot{\mathbf n}+mg\mathbf e_z

The ideal bearing can pull down as well as push up. A tip resting freely on a surface would need a separate model for one-sided contact and collisions.

Common difficulties

Angular momentum always points along the shaft

Typical misconceptionThe shaft and the angular momentum point the same way at every spin rate.

Better mental modelWhenever the axis moves, the transverse moment of inertia adds to the angular momentum. Compare the blue arrow with the shaft at low spin or on the fast branch.

A top that stays upright must be stable

Typical misconceptionIf a vertical top stays vertical, it must be stable.

Better mental modelBelow the threshold, the undisturbed vertical solution still exists. Compare runs that start from a small tilt to see how the top responds to a disturbance.

The pivot works like a tip on a table

Typical misconceptionAn ordinary table could supply the downward pull that the pivot provides.

Better mental modelHere a bearing holds the tip in place. A table cannot pull the tip down, and sliding, lifting off and collisions are outside the model.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Set up and look around

    Select free release, look at the overview, top and side views, then drag the orange tilt handle.

    What to observe: The new starting axis changes both the scene and the recorded numbers.
  2. 02

    Compare the steady branches

    Select the slow and fast branches with the nutation kick left at zero. Then reverse the spin.

    What to observe: The tilt stays constant only when the wheel starts exactly on that solution. Released without the right precession, it usually nutates.
  3. 03

    Test the approximation and the upright top

    Reduce the spin and check the approximation. For the conical top, compare the stable and unstable small-tilt presets.

    What to observe: The slow-precession approximation can fail, and the upright stability threshold shows up only when you disturb the top.
  4. 04

    Check the numerical accuracy

    Review the full record and look at the conservation errors and the difference between two step sizes. Use fine phase steps to follow the rotor markings.

    What to observe: Small numerical errors show that the model is solved accurately. They say nothing about friction or table contact, which the model leaves out.
FeedbackSomething broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy