Geometry and pivot inertia
Uniform solid cone with its apex fixed by an ideal captured bearing. Cone radius, height, centre of mass and pivot inertias share one geometry. The handle, marker and support are massless.
M057 · Rigid body / sleeping top
Inspect a uniform conical top with a captured apex in three dimensions. Separate axial spin, precession and nutation, compare two steady branches, and perturb a sleeping top on either side of its stability threshold. Read the pivot reaction and an independent numerical error ledger.
Physics tutorial
BackgroundInspect a uniform conical top with a captured apex in three dimensions. Separate axial spin, precession and nutation, compare two steady branches, and perturb a sleeping top on either side of its stability threshold. Read the pivot reaction and an independent numerical error ledger.
Why it mattersA shared rigid-body law explains both an instrument flywheel and a nutating top. Looking only at the spinning texture hides the important motion of its axis.
Start with the essentials
Uniform solid cone with its apex fixed by an ideal captured bearing. Cone radius, height, centre of mass and pivot inertias share one geometry. The handle, marker and support are massless.
All quantities refer to the fixed pivot. The symmetry axis and world angular momentum evolve together; the spin angle is reconstructed with a quaternion.
Physical axial spin is not the Euler spin-angle rate. Confusing them changes the exact steady-precession condition.
A real root prepares constant tilt only with zero initial nutation. A kick perturbs that solution. At a horizontal axis the equation becomes linear.
This estimate drops the transverse-inertia term. It becomes accurate when precession is small relative to axial spin, and is undefined at zero spin.
Potential energy is zero when the centre is at pivot height. Maximum errors are scaled by nonzero physical energy and momentum scales; they remain meaningful when an invariant itself vanishes.
This is a local linear stability condition. Exactly vertical rotation remains an exact solution even below threshold; use a small tilt to reveal its instability.
The ideal bearing can supply a negative vertical reaction. A freely resting tip would need a separate unilateral contact and collision model.
Typical misconceptionThe shaft direction and angular momentum are identical at every spin.
Better mental modelTransverse inertia contributes whenever the axis moves. Compare the blue arrow with the shaft in the low-spin or fast-branch preset.
Typical misconceptionA vertical top that remains vertical must be stable.
Better mental modelThe exact unperturbed solution survives below threshold. Compare small-tilt presets to test the response to a perturbation.
Typical misconceptionA negative vertical reaction can be supplied by an ordinary surface.
Better mental modelThis bearing captures the point. A tabletop cannot pull the tip; sliding, detachment and collisions are outside the model.
Select free release, inspect overview, top and side, then drag the orange tilt handle.
What to observe: The new initial axis drives both the physical scene and its quantitative record.Select slow and fast branches; leave the nutation kick at zero. Reverse the spin.
What to observe: Constant tilt is a prepared solution; a release without the required precession generally nutates.Reduce spin and inspect the approximation; for the conical top compare stable and unstable small-tilt presets.
What to observe: A slow-precession approximation can fail, and a local stability threshold needs a perturbation to become visible.Review the full record and inspect conservation defects and the difference between two step sizes. Use fine phase steps for rotor markings.
What to observe: A small numerical discrepancy supports the retained model; it does not certify omitted friction or tabletop contact physics.