Skip to main content
Sandbox Physics

Damped Oscillations & Ringdown

Can a position record measure damping even without visible peaks? Yes. Fit the whole position record to the viscous oscillator rather than requiring a train of peaks. The same model covers ringing and nonoscillatory returns. Check the residual and parameter uncertainty: near critical damping, noise may prevent you from distinguishing the two sides. Settling time also depends on the chosen displacement band and release.

Record a spring and viscous damper. Fit noisy positions across underdamped, critical and overdamped returns, then inspect uncertainty and settling time.

Interactive modelDamped Oscillations & Ringdown
Fitted damping ratio ± standard error0.12±1.7×10−40.12\pm1.7\times10^{-4}
Second-order quality parameter4.174.17
Predicted final entry into 2% band8.03 s8.03\,\mathrm{s}
Position-fit RMS0.52 mm0.52\,\mathrm{mm}

Damping without counting peaks

BackgroundA damped spring can swing across equilibrium, approach it quickly, or creep back without crossing. All three motions solve one differential equation, so a position record can identify them without requiring visible peaks.

Why it mattersOpenStax Section 15.5 gives the viscous oscillator. Lelas, Poljak and Jukić (2023) show why a finite tolerance changes what “fastest return” means; this experiment explicitly uses a displacement band.

Focus question
Can a noisy record distinguish damping regimes and predict when motion stays close to equilibrium?
One-sentence intuition
Fit the whole position record, then inspect its residual and parameter uncertainty. Near critical damping, noise may leave the regime unresolved even when a curve looks convincing.

Core mathematical model

One equation, three damping regimes

mq¨+cq˙+kq=0,ω0=k/m,ζ=c2mkm\ddot q+c\dot q+kq=0,\quad\omega_0=\sqrt{k/m},\quad\zeta=\frac{c}{2\sqrt{mk}}

Damping ratios below, at and above one define underdamped, critical and overdamped motion. The model remains continuous through the transition.

Fit camera positions, not the ideal motion

xi=xe+q(ti;ω0,ζ,q0,v0)+ϵi,min⁡∑i[xi−x^(ti)]2x_i=x_e+q(t_i;\omega_0,\zeta,q_0,v_0)+\epsilon_i,\quad\min\sum_i\bigl[x_i-\widehat x(t_i)\bigr]^2

Release velocity is controlled and known; initial displacement, equilibrium, frequency and damping ratio are fitted. Search does not receive the true frequency or damping.

A named settling criterion

ts=inf⁡{t: ∣q^(τ)∣≤0.02∣q^0∣ for every τ≥t}t_s=\inf\{t:\ |\widehat q(\tau)|\le0.02|\widehat q_0|\ \text{for every }\tau\ge t\}

This is final band entry, not the first crossing. Changing the tolerance or initial velocity changes the comparison between damping choices.

Dissipation and the quality parameter

E=12mq˙2+12kq2,E˙=−cq˙2,Q=12ζE=\tfrac12m\dot q^2+\tfrac12kq^2,\quad\dot E=-c\dot q^2,\quad Q=\frac1{2\zeta}

The quality parameter is defined for the second-order system. Interpreting it as stored energy divided by loss per cycle is a weak-damping approximation, and an overdamped return has no oscillation period.

Common difficulties

A critical-looking curve is not exact critical damping

Typical misconceptionThe fitted damping ratio is near one, so critical damping is proved.

Better mental modelThe local confidence interval can straddle one. Collect more useful early-time data before naming a side of the transition.

More damping need not mean earlier settling

Typical misconceptionThe strongest damper always stops motion first.

Better mental modelA large damper can make the slow mode return very slowly. A finite band can also favour a slightly underdamped release over an exactly critical one.

Run the experiment

  1. 01

    Read the fading swings

    Use Many fading swings and compare the red observations with the fitted curve.

    What to observe: Residuals vary around zero while the fitted damping ratio remains constrained.
  2. 02

    Remove the peaks

    Choose Return without ringing.

    What to observe: The full-position fit still works; it does not need a logarithmic peak train.
  3. 03

    Ask what the camera can resolve

    Choose Critical neighbourhood and increase position noise in the details.

    What to observe: Parameter uncertainty grows. If the record cannot constrain both nonlinear parameters, their readouts are hidden with an explanation.
Something broken, confusing, or missing on this page?Tell us
What kind of feedback?

Sent with this page’s address, its Lab ID, the site language and your device type. Please leave out personal details. Feedback is kept for up to 12 months.Privacy policy