---
title: "How Kusch and Foley found the electron’s extra magnetism"
description: "How can comparing atoms reveal a small correction to the magnetic response of an electron?"
canonical_url: "https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/kusch-foley-electron-magnetic-moment/"
language: "en"
page_type: "story"
alternate_languages:
  zh-CN: "https://sandboxphysics.com/zh/stories/quantum-evidence/kusch-foley-electron-magnetic-moment/"
last_modified: "2026-10-24"
---

[Quantum physics: reading the evidence](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/)

Nobel A · Evidence and control

# How Kusch and Foley found the electron’s extra magnetism

Sandbox Physics · 2026-10-15

How can comparing atoms reveal a small correction to the magnetic response of an electron?

## The atoms refused to fit one simple value

At Columbia University, Polykarp Kusch and Henry Foley compared how several atomic states responded to a magnetic field. Their 1947–48 work found a small, consistent mismatch with the leading picture of the electron. The 1948 report, The Magnetic Moment of the Electron, compared gallium, indium and sodium through resonance frequencies measured in a constant magnetic field.

The mismatch was about one part in a thousand in the electron’s spin response. Small as that sounds, it mattered: the same electronic property had to account for different atoms, each packaging the electron’s magnetic contributions in a different way.

Read the evidence: P. Kusch and H. M. Foley (1948), The Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Phys. Rev. 74, 250 — author abstract

## A resonance turns an energy gap into a frequency

An atom placed in a magnetic field has several nearby energy levels. An oscillating field can make it change levels when the driving frequency matches their energy gap. Scanning that frequency finds a resonance, a response that marks the transition.

The electron contributes magnetism associated with its orbital motion and with its intrinsic spin. Spin is an intrinsic quantum property; the electron need not be pictured as a rotating ball. Different atomic states combine these contributions in different proportions. Their magnetic factors describe how strongly the total energy responds to the field.

Comparing resonances in one shared field helps reduce reliance on its absolute calibration. The rest of the inference comes from the atomic structure: identify the levels, calculate how their contributions combine, and ask whether one set of electron factors explains all the measured ratios.

Read the evidence: P. Kusch and H. M. Foley (1948), The Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Phys. Rev. 74, 250 — author abstract P. A. M. Dirac (1928), The Quantum Theory of the Electron, Proc. R. Soc. A 117, 610–624 — UC San Diego scan

## Several comparisons pointed in the same direction

A single displaced resonance might come from a complication of that particular atom. Kusch and Foley’s comparisons instead gave a consistent correction across states with different electronic weightings. Their 1948 abstract used that agreement, together with theoretical arguments, to reject a perturbation explanation for the observed ratios. The key was the pattern shared by the comparisons.

Read the evidence: P. Kusch and H. M. Foley (1948), The Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Phys. Rev. 74, 250 — author abstract

## Read the number with its date attached

The expression below is the 1948 result, with the orbital factor taken as one apart from the residual effects discussed by the authors. The spin factor is written as a positive magnitude. Because the electron is negatively charged, its magnetic moment points opposite to its spin.

Dividing this factor by two gives a value about 0.00119 above one. That fractional excess is called the anomaly: the small extra response beyond Dirac’s leading value. The uncertainty belongs to the historical estimate quoted here. Keep the 1947 announcement, the 1948 number and later measurements separately dated when following how the precision improved.

$$
g_S=2(1.00119\pm0.00005)
$$

Read the evidence: P. Kusch and H. M. Foley (1948), The Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Phys. Rev. 74, 250 — author abstract P. A. M. Dirac (1928), The Quantum Theory of the Electron, Proc. R. Soc. A 117, 610–624 — UC San Diego scan

## Later experiments gave the electron a simpler home

Kusch and Foley reached the electron through atoms. Later Penning-trap experiments kept one electron and compared its spin resonance with its circling motion in the same magnetic field. The field largely cancels from the frequency ratio, while the cavity and trap bring new instrumental corrections. Fan and colleagues’ 2023 paper is one separately dated example of this route.

The anomaly also became a precise target for theory. Quantum electrodynamics calculates how the electron’s interaction with the electromagnetic field modifies its magnetic response; at sufficiently high precision, other interactions enter too. Comparing a modern prediction with the measurement requires an independently known fine-structure constant as well as the theoretical calculation. The early atomic comparisons supplied the experimental puzzle that such calculations had to explain.

Read the evidence: X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra and G. Gabrielse (2023), Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801 P. A. M. Dirac (1928), The Quantum Theory of the Electron, Proc. R. Soc. A 117, 610–624 — UC San Diego scan

## Continue with the models

These teaching Labs produce simulated data, which are separate from the historical observations discussed above.

- [Compare atomic resonances with different spin and orbital weightings](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/atomic-magnetic-moment-comparator/)

## Sources and reading notes

The 2026-10-24 rewrite rechecked the accessible 1948 Kusch–Foley author abstract; the full PDF requires authorization. Its quoted result is kept separate from the first 1947 announcement and the full 2023 single-electron paper used for method comparison. Dirac’s paper supplies the leading theoretical comparison. No historical resonance records are refitted.

1. [P. A. M. Dirac (1928), The Quantum Theory of the Electron, Proc. R. Soc. A 117, 610–624 — UC San Diego scan](https://mathweb.ucsd.edu/~nwallach/Dirac1928.pdf)
2. [P. Kusch and H. M. Foley (1948), The Magnetic Moment of the Electron, Phys. Rev. 74, 250 — author abstract](https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.74.250)
3. [X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra and G. Gabrielse (2023), Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 071801](https://physics.aps.org/featured-article-pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.071801)

[Blackbody radiation: a whole curve, not one quantum](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/blackbody-spectrum-planck-wien/) [Photoelectric evidence: the voltage is not yet the energy](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/photoelectric-stopping-potential-contact/) [Oil drops: finding a charge unit in falling times](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/millikan-oil-drop-charge-inference/) [Atomic spectra: evidence for states, not photographs of orbits](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/atomic-spectra-stationary-states/) [Franck–Hertz: what a drop in current can show](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/franck-hertz-discrete-excitation/) [Compton scattering: light must balance momentum too](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/compton-scattering-energy-momentum/) [de Broglie: a wavelength for matter, a speed for the packet](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/de-broglie-matter-waves-phase-packets/) [Matrices and waves: two routes to the same predictions](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/matrix-wave-mechanics-observables/) [Born: how a scattering direction became a probability](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/born-scattering-probability/) [Pauli: count the states before filling the shells](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/pauli-spectra-exclusion-principle/) [Dirac’s electron: a successful equation with an unfinished story](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/dirac-electron-spin-relativity/) [Why a magnetic field splits a spectral line](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/zeeman-lines-polarization-lorentz/) [How an electric field splits hydrogen’s spectral lines](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/stark-effect-electric-field-spectra/) [Reading atomic motion in the colours of canal rays](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/stark-canal-rays-doppler-emitters/) [What two silver traces revealed about atoms](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/stern-gerlach-silver-beam-spin/) [Measuring the proton’s magnetism with a hydrogen beam](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/stern-proton-moment-molecular-hydrogen/) [How to tell when a nucleus is in resonance](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/magnetic-resonance-beams-absorption-induction/) [How light moves atoms into states that stop absorbing](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/optical-pumping-populations-double-resonance/) [How missing hydrogen atoms revealed the Lamb shift](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/lamb-shift-microwave-evidence/) [How a crystal takes the recoil of an emitting nucleus](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/mossbauer-recoil-free-resonance/) [How Ramsey and ion traps gave atoms more time](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/ramsey-ion-traps-measurement/) [Reading a cavity phase error in an atomic fountain](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/ramsey-cavity-phase-frequency-bias/) [Counting the quantum noise left by a perfect detector](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/quantum-projection-noise-population-counts/) [Following a fountain clock’s extrapolation to zero density](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/fountain-clock-collision-density-extrapolation/) [How a changing electric field holds an ion](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/paul-trap-dynamic-stability-micromotion/) [How Dehmelt listened to the spin of one electron](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/dehmelt-single-electron-penning-spin-readout/) [When sodium atoms came out colder than expected](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/laser-cooling-below-doppler-limit/) [Keeping a slowing atomic beam in tune with one laser](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/zeeman-slowing-neutral-atom-beam/) [How six laser beams slowed Chu’s atoms](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/chu-optical-molasses-diffusion-escape/) [Reading a cold-atom thermometer from the flight of the cloud](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/cold-atom-ballistic-thermometry/) [How an atom loses energy climbing hills made of light](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/sisyphus-cooling-polarization-energy/) [How helium atoms escaped the light and formed two narrow peaks](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/subrecoil-cooling-dark-state-momentum/) [How one trapped ion switches its fluorescence off and on](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/electron-shelving-single-ion-jumps/) [Reading the sidebands in the first ion ground-state cooling experiment](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/sideband-asymmetry-ground-state-cooling/) [Let a second ion read out a narrow transition](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/quantum-logic-spectroscopy-shared-motion/) [How to measure one quantum system and keep it available](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/single-quantum-measurement-backaction/) [A cavity cat loses coherence before it loses its energy](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/cavity-cat-coherence-energy-decay/) [Counting stored photons one atom at a time](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/qnd-photon-counting-atomic-records/) [Keeping a chosen number of photons in a cavity](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/quantum-feedback-photon-number-verification/) [How Bell tests distinguish quantum correlations](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/bell-tests-correlations-loopholes/) [Freedman and Clauser test Bell’s inequality with calcium light](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/freedman-clauser-coincidence-normalization/) [Aspect changes the analyzers while photons are in flight](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/aspect-switching-spacetime-records/) [A readiness signal makes the Bell trial countable](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/event-ready-bell-trials-finite-statistics/) [Photon Bell tests keep the trials where detectors stay silent](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/photon-bell-losses-optical-trials/) [Three-photon GHZ correlations defeat a shared answer sheet](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/ghz-parity-three-photon-records/) [How the 1997 photon experiment transferred a quantum state](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/quantum-teleportation-conditional-records/) [A photon announces when to look for its partner](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/heralded-photon-anticorrelation-gates/) [Two photons leave the beam splitter together](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/hong-ou-mandel-dip-mode-overlap/) [A joint measurement entangles two photons that never met](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/entanglement-swapping-fourfold-records/) [The later measurement sorts earlier photon detections](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/delayed-choice-swapping-sorted-records/) [Dense coding sends three distinguishable messages with one photon](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/dense-coding-three-messages-resources/) [Reconstructing a photon state from calibrated counts](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/photon-tomography-counts-physical-states/)