---
title: "The Hong–Ou–Mandel dip: which alternatives became indistinguishable?"
description: "Why does a coincidence dip measure mode overlap rather than a photon disappearing?"
canonical_url: "https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/hong-ou-mandel-dip-mode-overlap/"
language: "en"
page_type: "story"
alternate_languages:
  zh-CN: "https://sandboxphysics.com/zh/stories/quantum-evidence/hong-ou-mandel-dip-mode-overlap/"
last_modified: "2026-10-18"
---

[Quantum physics: reading the evidence](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/)

Nobel A · Evidence and control

# The Hong–Ou–Mandel dip: which alternatives became indistinguishable?

Sandbox Physics · 2026-10-18

Why does a coincidence dip measure mode overlap rather than a photon disappearing?

## Scan a path, count pairs

Hong, Ou and Mandel’s 1987 apparatus brought two down-converted photons to opposite inputs of a beam splitter and scanned its position. The measured curve counted coincidences between output detectors. The dip revealed a short relative-time scale through interference despite much slower detector timing.

The paper’s plotted coincidences had accidentals subtracted. Its electronics accepted a 7.5-nanosecond coincidence interval, and a displaced interval estimated the accidental contribution. Those acquisition windows are not the approximately hundred-femtosecond coherence scale inferred from the optical scan.

Read the evidence: C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel (1987), Measurement of Subpicosecond Time Intervals between Two Photons by Interference, PRL 59, 2044–2046 — scanned copy

## Start with a narrower input model

For our teaching equation, assume exactly one photon in each input, a lossless balanced splitter and two independent pure normalized wave packets. Their inner product includes every internal mode that can distinguish them, after applying the scanned relative delay. Coincidence means one photon in each output, with ideal collection.

At full overlap, the both-transmitted and both-reflected alternatives for that output cancel. The two photons still leave the apparatus, together through one output or the other. Orthogonal polarization or nonoverlapping arrival modes remove the cancellation and restore a coincidence probability of one half.

$$
P_{\mathrm{coin}}(\tau)=\frac{1-\left|\langle f\mid g_{\tau}\rangle\right|^2}{2}
$$

Read the evidence: C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel (1987), Measurement of Subpicosecond Time Intervals between Two Photons by Interference, PRL 59, 2044–2046 — scanned copy A. M. Brańczyk (2017), Hong–Ou–Mandel Interference — author notes, arXiv:1711.00080

## A mixed input changes the inference

Equal spectra are not enough to justify that pure-product formula. In an independent mixed-state example with two orthogonal modes, let each photon occupy either mode with equal probability. Half the input pairs then match and half do not; their average zero-delay coincidence probability is one quarter.

This gives a dip only halfway down from the distinguishable reference even with otherwise perfect optics. Spectral correlations between photons require their joint state instead. The historical down-conversion calculation and the independent pure-packet example therefore answer related questions under different input assumptions.

Read the evidence: A. M. Brańczyk (2017), Hong–Ou–Mandel Interference — author notes, arXiv:1711.00080

## An unbalanced splitter leaves a floor

Take an invented lossless splitter with intensity reflection 0.60 and transmission 0.40. Perfectly matching photons have a coincidence probability of 0.04; distinguishable photons have 0.52. The corresponding visibility is about 0.923. A nonzero minimum here comes entirely from splitter imbalance.

The result follows by adding the signed double-reflection and double-transmission amplitudes before squaring. Adding their probabilities first gives the distinguishable reference. This provides a useful independent check on a plotted dip: zero is a prediction of balance and matching together, not of photon counting alone.

Read the evidence: C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel (1987), Measurement of Subpicosecond Time Intervals between Two Photons by Interference, PRL 59, 2044–2046 — scanned copy A. M. Brańczyk (2017), Hong–Ou–Mandel Interference — author notes, arXiv:1711.00080

## Report the normalization

In a separate invented count example, a far-delay bin has 110 events and the dip bin has 20, each with an independently estimated constant background of ten. Raw visibility is about 0.818; background-corrected visibility is 0.90. Both describe declared records, and neither can silently stand in for the other.

Keep exposure time, source drift, accidental-window scaling and uncertainty propagation with the curve. Optical displacement must also be converted through the actual path geometry. Moving a reflector can change a round-trip path twice as much; copying a distance axis directly into a delay axis can therefore misstate the inferred width.

Read the evidence: C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel (1987), Measurement of Subpicosecond Time Intervals between Two Photons by Interference, PRL 59, 2044–2046 — scanned copy

## The dip is a component test

Good two-photon interference helps a Bell-state analyzer operate as intended. It does not by itself certify polarization entanglement, close detection loopholes or establish a complete quantum communication channel. Those tasks need additional settings and resource records.

The linked Lab collects a coincidence dip in its teaching model. Compare delay, polarization and overlap while keeping the source assumptions visible. Carry that habit into the swapping and dense-coding readings: identify which alternatives the analyzer combines before deciding what a successful detector pattern means.

Read the evidence: A. M. Brańczyk (2017), Hong–Ou–Mandel Interference — author notes, arXiv:1711.00080 J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, H. Weinfurter and A. Zeilinger (1998), Experimental Entanglement Swapping, PRL 80, 3891–3894

## Continue with the models

These are existing teaching Labs. Their simulated records are separate from the historical observations discussed above.

- [Acquire a teaching coincidence dip](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/hong-ou-mandel/)

## Sources and reading notes

We visually read all three pages of the 1987 paper from a scanned PDF; its text extraction was empty. We also consulted Brańczyk’s 2017 notes for the distinct pure, mixed and spectrally entangled input cases. The simplified overlap equation and all numerical examples below are declared teaching cases, not a fit of the original curve.

1. [C. K. Hong, Z. Y. Ou and L. Mandel (1987), Measurement of Subpicosecond Time Intervals between Two Photons by Interference, PRL 59, 2044–2046 — scanned copy](https://quantumagic.narod.ru/Articles/Mandel_1987.pdf)
2. [A. M. Brańczyk (2017), Hong–Ou–Mandel Interference — author notes, arXiv:1711.00080](https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.00080)
3. [J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, H. Weinfurter and A. Zeilinger (1998), Experimental Entanglement Swapping, PRL 80, 3891–3894](https://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3891)

[Blackbody radiation: a whole curve, not one quantum](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/blackbody-spectrum-planck-wien/) [Photoelectric evidence: the voltage is not yet the energy](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/photoelectric-stopping-potential-contact/) [Oil drops: finding a charge unit in falling times](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/millikan-oil-drop-charge-inference/) [Atomic spectra: evidence for states, not photographs of orbits](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/atomic-spectra-stationary-states/) [Franck–Hertz: what a falling current can establish](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/franck-hertz-discrete-excitation/) [Compton scattering: light must balance momentum too](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/compton-scattering-energy-momentum/) [de Broglie: a wavelength for matter, a speed for the packet](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/de-broglie-matter-waves-phase-packets/) [Matrices and waves: two routes to the same predictions](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/matrix-wave-mechanics-observables/) [Born: how a scattering direction became a probability](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/born-scattering-probability/) [Pauli: count the states before filling the shells](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/pauli-spectra-exclusion-principle/) [Dirac’s electron: a successful equation with an unfinished story](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/dirac-electron-spin-relativity/) [Zeeman lines: polarization belongs to the evidence](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/zeeman-lines-polarization-lorentz/) [The Stark effect: an electric field changes the spectrum](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/stark-effect-electric-field-spectra/) [Canal rays: moving light does not identify the emitter by itself](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/stark-canal-rays-doppler-emitters/) [Stern–Gerlach: two traces, then a new interpretation](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/stern-gerlach-silver-beam-spin/) [Stern’s proton moment: a small deflection with a large consequence](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/stern-proton-moment-molecular-hydrogen/) [Magnetic resonance: three ways to notice a transition](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/magnetic-resonance-beams-absorption-induction/) [Optical pumping: make a population difference visible](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/optical-pumping-populations-double-resonance/) [The Lamb shift: a missing signal reveals a missing correction](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/lamb-shift-microwave-evidence/) [Kusch and Foley: a small mismatch between magnetic factors](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/kusch-foley-electron-magnetic-moment/) [Mössbauer resonance: recoil has not disappeared](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/mossbauer-recoil-free-resonance/) [Ramsey and ion traps: make time to measure](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/ramsey-ion-traps-measurement/) [Ramsey clocks: a stable fringe can carry a phase bias](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/ramsey-cavity-phase-frequency-bias/) [Quantum projection noise: better detection still leaves a random count](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/quantum-projection-noise-population-counts/) [Fountain clocks: the density ratio is part of the correction](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/fountain-clock-collision-density-extrapolation/) [Paul’s trap: stability comes from the changing field](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/paul-trap-dynamic-stability-micromotion/) [Dehmelt’s single electron: spin appears as an axial frequency shift](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/dehmelt-single-electron-penning-spin-readout/) [Laser cooling: when the temperature contradicted the model](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/laser-cooling-below-doppler-limit/) [Zeeman slowing: keep a moving atom within reach of the light](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/zeeman-slowing-neutral-atom-beam/) [Chu’s optical molasses: slowing motion while atoms still escape](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/chu-optical-molasses-diffusion-escape/) [Cold-atom thermometry: read the flight, then infer the temperature](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/cold-atom-ballistic-thermometry/) [Sisyphus cooling: where the energy leaves the hill](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/sisyphus-cooling-polarization-energy/) [Subrecoil cooling: two narrow peaks are not zero motion](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/subrecoil-cooling-dark-state-momentum/) [A dark interval from one ion: reading electron shelving](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/electron-shelving-single-ion-jumps/) [Unequal sidebands: how cold is a trapped ion?](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/sideband-asymmetry-ground-state-cooling/) [Quantum logic spectroscopy: let another ion report the answer](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/quantum-logic-spectroscopy-shared-motion/) [Single quantum systems: what survives a measurement?](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/single-quantum-measurement-backaction/) [A cavity cat loses coherence before it loses its energy](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/cavity-cat-coherence-energy-decay/) [Counting stored light: one atom gives a clue](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/qnd-photon-counting-atomic-records/) [Quantum feedback: a target needs more than an estimate](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/quantum-feedback-photon-number-verification/) [Bell tests: correlations need an experimental contract](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/bell-tests-correlations-loopholes/) [Freedman–Clauser: the denominator belongs to the experiment](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/freedman-clauser-coincidence-normalization/) [Aspect’s switches: read the spacetime before the slogan](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/aspect-switching-spacetime-records/) [An event-ready Bell test: count the trials before the wins](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/event-ready-bell-trials-finite-statistics/) [Photon Bell tests: the trials with no clicks still count](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/photon-bell-losses-optical-trials/) [GHZ correlations: four settings, no consistent instruction table](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/ghz-parity-three-photon-records/) [Teleportation: read the conditions before the coincidence](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/quantum-teleportation-conditional-records/) [Heralded photons: the missing coincidences need a denominator](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/heralded-photon-anticorrelation-gates/) [Entanglement swapping: four clicks define the selected pair](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/entanglement-swapping-fourfold-records/) [Delayed-choice swapping: later labels, earlier records](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/delayed-choice-swapping-sorted-records/) [Dense coding: three messages and a resource ledger](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/dense-coding-three-messages-resources/) [Photon tomography: a physical matrix still needs calibrated counts](https://sandboxphysics.com/stories/quantum-evidence/photon-tomography-counts-physical-states/)