---
title: "Andreev Reflection Interactive Lab | Sandbox Physics"
description: "Send an electron. Get a hole back. Launch an electron wavepacket into a superconducting interface. Watch the returning wave switch character, raise a barrier to stop the conversion, then cross the gap to transmit into the superconductor."
canonical_url: "https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/andreev-electron-hole-reflection/"
language: "en"
page_type: "lab"
alternate_languages:
  zh-CN: "https://sandboxphysics.com/zh/labs/andreev-electron-hole-reflection/"
last_modified: "2026-10-18"
---

SUPERCONDUCTING INTERFACE / ELECTRON–HOLE CONVERSION

# Andreev Reflection

Launch an electron wavepacket into a superconducting interface. Watch the returning wave switch character, raise a barrier to stop the conversion, then cross the gap to transmit into the superconductor.

> Interactive simulation: open this page in a web browser to change the parameters and run the model.

A one-dimensional tight-binding Bogoliubov–de Gennes model with a prescribed s-wave pair potential. Electron and hole ribbons are components on the same wire, not two paths. Finite wavepacket, zero-temperature mean field; no self-consistent condensate, collisions or calibrated conductance measurement.

ONE INTERFACE. TWO KINDS OF RETURN.

HOLE WEIGHT IN THE NORMAL REGION

$0$

GOLD PLANE · NS INTERFACE

$0$

CYAN · ELECTRON CORAL · HOLE HEIGHT · PROBABILITY PER SITE

The two ribbons are Nambu components on ONE wire, not two trajectories. Fixed linear probability height. The shaded right half has superconducting pairing.

$0$

01 / THE COMPLETE COLLISION

### Follow the color that comes back.

Position left to right; time 0 at the top and 75 at the bottom. Cyan is electron weight, coral is hole weight. Color uses a fixed square-root gain; the gold line is the interface.

DARK 0 → BRIGHT 0.04 per site

02 / A LOCAL LOOK

### Two components. One normalized state.

Cyan: electron probability per site. Coral: hole probability per site. Both components use the same position axis. Gold marks the interface at site 161.

$j\ \longrightarrow\quad |u_j|^2,\ |v_j|^2$

03 / PROBABILITY BUDGET

### Where did the excitation go?

Cyan: electrons in the normal region. Coral: holes in the normal region. Purple: total weight inside the superconductor. Early left-electron weight includes the incoming packet; only separated late packets describe reflection.

$\tau=Jt/\hbar\ \longrightarrow\quad P$

04 / INDEPENDENT BULK REFERENCE

### The gap decides what can propagate.

Analytic bands of the infinite uniform superconductor. The gold line is the incident packet’s central energy, which has a finite spread.

$k\ \longrightarrow\quad E/J$

TURN THE MODEL INTO RECORDS

## Count what came back.

0 / 8000

Ideal component-and-position Born readouts from independent preparations at the selected time. These are simulated quasiparticle snapshots, not a calibrated detector or a count of Cooper pairs. Fixed reproducible seed.

Recorded normal-hole fraction

$\text{—}$

95% Wilson interval · shot noise

$\text{—}$

Model probability

$\text{—}$

Norm drift

$\text{—}$

### Records in gold. Model in cyan.

Three exhaustive outcomes: normal electron, normal hole, or either component inside the superconductor. The bars are built only from saved records.

Latest 20 records · export every trial

| Trial | Site | Component |
| --- | --- | --- |

Model, units and sources

320 sites with open ends. The normal region ends at site 160; pairing begins at 161. A one-site barrier sits at 160. The initial electron is centered at site 81 with position standard deviation 12 sites.

Position increases to the right in lattice-spacing units. Hopping sets the energy unit; time is measured in reduced Planck constant divided by hopping. Ribbons are a diagnostic representation, with schematic spacing between components.

$$
H=\begin{pmatrix}h&\Delta_s\\\Delta_s&-h\end{pmatrix},\quad h_{j,j+1}=-J,\quad h_{160,160}=V
$$

Symmetric split evolution uses exact onsite and disjoint-bond rotations, with time step 0.0125. No renormalization, absorbing boundary or probability clipping. The displayed interval ends before significant boundary returns; the numerical boundary weight is monitored. The pair potential is prescribed, not solved self-consistently.

$P_{\mathrm{edge}}=0$ · Probability in the outer eight sites on either end.

Sources: Blonder, Tinkham and Klapwijk’s interface theory and the BdG formulation in the Kwant superconductivity tutorial. The lattice wavepacket is not the continuum BTK approximation.

- [Blonder–Tinkham–Klapwijk · Superconducting interfaces](https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515)
- [Kwant · Superconductors and electron–hole degrees of freedom](https://kwant-project.org/doc/latest/tutorial/superconductors)

Physics tutorial

## Andreev Reflection

**Background** Launch an electron wavepacket into a superconducting interface. Watch the returning wave switch character, raise a barrier to stop the conversion, then cross the gap to transmit into the superconductor.

**Why it matters** Connect a visible change to the spectrum of a superconducting system.

Start with the essentials

- **Focus question**: Send an electron. Get a hole back.
- **One-sentence intuition**: Pairing mixes electron and hole amplitudes. A subgap excitation can return as a hole.

### Core mathematical model

#### Electron and hole amplitudes

$$
i\hbar\partial_t\begin{pmatrix}u\\v\end{pmatrix}=H_{\mathrm{BdG}}\begin{pmatrix}u\\v\end{pmatrix}
$$

These are two components of a quasiparticle, not independent physical paths.

#### Uniform superconducting spectrum

$$
E(k)^2=4J^2\cos^2 k+\Delta_s^2
$$

An energy inside the bulk gap has no propagating quasiparticle mode deep in the superconductor.

### Common difficulties

#### Respect the scope

**Typical misconception** A hole is a positron emitted by the interface.

**Better mental model** A hole describes a missing electronic occupation relative to the reference condensate. Andreev conversion exchanges charge with that condensate.

#### A diagnostic is not a photograph

**Typical misconception** The raised ribbons are paths followed by individual particles.

**Better mental model** Ribbon height encodes a declared probability or spectral density. The two colors share the same physical site coordinate.

### Run the experiment

1. 01

   #### Make a prediction

   Compare the three presets, then change one continuous control.

   **What to observe:** The barrier suppresses hole conversion; sufficient energy permits transmission.

2. 02

   #### Inspect the cause

   Scrub from the incoming packet to the separated outgoing packets.

   **What to observe:** Early-time left-electron weight includes the incoming packet; it is not yet a reflection probability.

3. 03

   #### Acquire evidence

   Collect repeated records, inspect the histogram and interval, then export the complete CSV.

   **What to observe:** The model curve is a separate reference. Only recorded events build the gold histogram.

Physical conclusion

A one-dimensional tight-binding Bogoliubov–de Gennes model with a prescribed s-wave pair potential. Electron and hole ribbons are components on the same wire, not two paths. Finite wavepacket, zero-temperature mean field; no self-consistent condensate, collisions or calibrated conductance measurement.

Quantum & fields · Starter path

## Start from a single measurement

Predict outcomes and collect counts, building from one qubit to wave packets, bound states and two-photon interference.

[Start here → **Quantum State & Born Measurement** Predict a probability, turn the analyzer, then compare it with the frequency of acquired shots. Observe · 15 min](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/qubit-state/)

1. [1 Quantum State & Born Measurement](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/qubit-state/)
2. [2 Stern–Gerlach Sequence](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/stern-gerlach-sequence/)
3. [3 Wave Packet & Uncertainty](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/wave-packet-uncertainty/)
4. [4 Quantum Harmonic Oscillator](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/quantum-harmonic-oscillator/)
5. [5 Which Path & Quantum Eraser](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/quantum-eraser/)
6. [6 Hong–Ou–Mandel Two-Photon Interference](https://sandboxphysics.com/labs/hong-ou-mandel/)

[View the full path →](https://sandboxphysics.com/topics/quantum/#starter-path)
